Literature DB >> 9196458

Study of business ethics in occupational medicine.

R Philipp1, G Goodman, K Harling, B Beattie.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the views of specialists in occupational medicine about business ethics in occupational medicine.
METHOD: A qualitative study with face to face focus groups and successive reviews of the draft consensus was undertaken of all accredited specialists in occupational medicine who were members of the south Wales and west of England group of the Society of Occupational Medicine, and of all regional specialty advisers and deputies from the Faculty of Occupational Medicine.
RESULTS: There was widespread agreement for the need of a code of business ethics. In all, during the four draft stages of preparing a consensus, 72% (28/39) of members of the south Wales and west of England group of the Society of Occupational Medicine, and 31% (20/64) of regional specialty advisers and deputies provided detailed comment for inclusion in it.
CONCLUSIONS: Consensus of their views was reached among study participants for issues of business ethics involving advertising, competence, qualifications, fees, commitment, changes in provider contracts, regulation, and supervision of trainees. It provides a basis for further debate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9196458      PMCID: PMC1128784          DOI: 10.1136/oem.54.5.351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  11 in total

1.  Commercially sensitive ethics.

Authors:  E A Harris
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1992-12-09

2.  Qualitative methods for assessing health care.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; M Boulton
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-06

Review 3.  Medicine as business and profession.

Authors:  G J Agich
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1990-12

4.  Only doing my duty?

Authors:  G Adshead
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-10-14

5.  Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.

Authors:  J Kitzinger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-07-29

Review 6.  Qualitative research in medical practice.

Authors:  K Ryan; H Denz-Penhey
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1996-03-22

7.  Clinical guidelines and the law.

Authors:  B Hurwitz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-12-09

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging marketing and investment. Tensions between the forces of business and the practice of medicine.

Authors:  L T Cowley; H L Isaacs; S W Young; T A Raffin
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Medicine in transition--emerging ethical issues in the global village.

Authors:  R B Purtilo
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.473

10.  Ethics, advertising and the definition of a profession.

Authors:  A R Dyer
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.903

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Privacy and occupational health services.

Authors:  A Heikkinen; V Launis; P Wainwright; H Leino-Kilpi
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  How is the New Public Management applied in the occupational health care system? - decision-makers' and OH personnel's views in Finland.

Authors:  Hanna Hakulinen; Sari Rissanen; Johanna Lammintakanen
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2011-08-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.