Literature DB >> 9196161

Phase II randomized trial of gallium nitrate plus fluorouracil versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma.

J A McCaffrey1, S Hilton, M Mazumdar, S Sadan, M Heineman, J Hirsch, W K Kelly, H I Scher, D F Bajorin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A phase II randomized trial of gallium nitrate/fluorouracil (5-FU) versus dose-intense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) was performed in poor-risk patients with advanced urothelial tract tumors. The efficacy and toxicity of these regimens were compared. Assessment of dose-intense M-VAC as salvage treatment in patients who failed to respond to the gallium nitrate/5-FU regimen was also performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients who had not received prior systemic chemotherapy were randomized to either arm of the study. All patients had one or more clinical features predicting a low likelihood of durable complete response to standard chemotherapy, ie, weight loss, visceral metastases, and low performance status. Gallium nitrate and 5-FU were each administered by continuous 5-day infusions every 28 days. M-VAC was recycled every 21 days, with prophylactic recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rh-G-CSF).
RESULTS: Two of 17 patients (12%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4% to 36.4%) had a major response to gallium nitrate/5-FU. Sixteen of 17 patients treated with M-VAC (94%; 95% CI, 71.3% to 99.8%) demonstrated a major response. Five of 12 patients who failed to respond to the gallium nitrate/5-FU combination responded to M-VAC as second-line therapy (42%; 95% CI, 15.2% to 72.3%). Median survival for the gallium nitrate and 5-FU arm was 19 versus 17 months for the M-VAC arm, with a median follow-up duration of 35 months (range, 2 to 51) for all patients. Dose-intense M-VAC was associated with a greater incidence of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia.
CONCLUSION: Dose-intense M-VAC is superior to gallium nitrate/5-FU in poor-risk patients (P < .0001). Despite the overall high response rate, the median survival for patients with M-VAC remained unsatisfactory. Similar survival distributions were observed for patients who received investigational therapy followed by cisplatin-based therapy and patients treated with initial cisplatin-based therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9196161     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.6.2449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  7 in total

1.  Prognostic model for predicting survival of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Andrea B Apolo; Irina Ostrovnaya; Susan Halabi; Alexia Iasonos; George K Philips; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Jamie Riches; Eric J Small; Matthew I Milowsky; Dean F Bajorin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  State-of-the-art management of metastatic disease at initial presentation or recurrence.

Authors:  Fabio Calabrò; Cora N Sternberg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Medical applications and toxicities of gallium compounds.

Authors:  Christopher R Chitambar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Phase 2 trial of sorafenib in patients with advanced urothelial cancer: a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Authors:  Robert Dreicer; Hailun Li; Mark Stein; Robert DiPaola; Michael Eleff; Bruce J Roth; George Wilding
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Clinical pharmacology and clinical trials of ribonucleotide reductase inhibitors: is it a viable cancer therapy?

Authors:  Mukundan Baskar Mannargudi; Subrata Deb
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 4.322

6.  Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy Regimens in Advanced or Metastatic Bladder and Urothelial Carcinomas: An Updated Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hong-Chen Qu; Yan Huang; Zhong-Yi Mu; Hang Lv; Qing-Peng Xie; Kai Wang; Bin Hu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 7.  Approved checkpoint inhibitors in bladder cancer: which drug should be used when?

Authors:  Pooja Ghatalia; Matthew Zibelman; Daniel M Geynisman; Elizabeth Plimack
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 8.168

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.