Literature DB >> 9192920

Asthma in Greenwich, UK: impact of the disease and current management practices.

G B Marks1, P G Burney, U N Premaratne, J Simpson, J Webb.   

Abstract

A great deal of the care of patients with asthma takes place in general practices. The aim of the present study was to describe the impact of asthma in the community and to identify current asthma self-management practices. A two-part questionnaire survey was conducted in a random sample (23%; n=24,398) of persons aged 16-50 yrs, registered with one of the 41 general practices in Greenwich, London, UK. The two parts were: a screening questionnaire identifying persons with current asthma (defined as waking with shortness of breath in the last 12 months, attack of asthma in the last 12 months, or currently taking treatment for asthma); and an asthma questionnaire (completed by those with asthma) assessing quality of life, frequency of asthma symptoms, possession and use of self-management tools, and action in the event of an exacerbation of asthma. The crude response rate was 51%, but this may be an underestimate due to errors in the sampling frame. The prevalences of wheeze and asthma in the past 12 months were 26% and 14%, respectively. Among asthma patients: 43% reported symptoms occurring three or more times per week, and 20% were woken by asthma symptoms on three or more nights per week; most had asthma with a mild impact on quality of life; 26% used inhaled steroids on most days in the preceding month; 16% had a peak flow meter at home; and 7% had oral steroids available. Of the 44% of subjects with asthma, who could identify an exacerbation of asthma in the preceding 6 months: 19% had used a peak flow meter during the episode; 19% had changed their treatment without first being told to do so by a doctor; and 50% had sought urgent medical help. Smokers used less appropriate asthma management and subjects whose asthma had a severe impact on quality of life used more treatment and peak flow monitoring. In conclusion, the prevalence of asthma among adults in Greenwich, UK, has increased since a similar survey in 1986. Many people have fairly mild asthma and a smaller number have severe disease. Much remains to be done to promote appropriate strategies for self-management of asthma exacerbations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9192920     DOI: 10.1183/09031936.97.10061224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Respir J        ISSN: 0903-1936            Impact factor:   16.671


  12 in total

1.  Greenwich asthma study. Study's conclusions are premature.

Authors:  G Feder; C Griffiths; G Foster; S Ahmed; D Maclaren; Y Carter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-02-26

2.  The influence of chronic respiratory conditions on health status and work disability.

Authors:  Mark D Eisner; Edward H Yelin; Laura Trupin; Paul D Blanc
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 3.  Written action plans for asthma: an evidence-based review of the key components.

Authors:  P G Gibson; H Powell
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 9.139

4.  A randomized clinical trial of peak flow versus symptom monitoring in older adults with asthma.

Authors:  A Sonia Buist; William M Vollmer; Sandra R Wilson; E Ann Frazier; Arthur D Hayward
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Patient preferences for autonomy in decision making in asthma management.

Authors:  R J Adams; B J Smith; R E Ruffin
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Morbidity from asthma in relation to regular treatment: a community based study.

Authors:  L J Walsh; C A Wong; S Cooper; A R Guhan; M Pringle; A E Tattersfield
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Clustered randomised trial of an intervention to improve the management of asthma: Greenwich asthma study.

Authors:  U N Premaratne; J A Sterne; G B Marks; J R Webb; H Azima; P G Burney
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-08

8.  Factorial design for the analysis of patient's quality of life in asthma.

Authors:  Agnes Mészáros; Romána Zelkó; Andrea Meskó; Zoltán Vincze
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Frequent paracetamol use and asthma in adults.

Authors:  S O Shaheen; J A Sterne; C E Songhurst; P G Burney
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  Correspondence between the RAND-Negative Impact of Asthma on Quality of Life item bank and the Marks Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Authors:  Maria Orlando Edelen; Brian D Stucky; Cathy Sherbourne; Nicole Eberhart; Marielena Lara
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.393

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.