Literature DB >> 9191700

Clinical quality measurement. Comparing chart review and automated methodologies.

M V Dresser1, L Feingold, S L Rosenkranz, K L Coltin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the use of data from automated systems within a large managed care plan to create indicators of clinical quality.
METHODS: Measures from the first year of Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set, HEDIS 2.0, are used to compare chart review and automated analysis methodologies. The contributions of various data systems in creating clinical quality measures are evaluated.
RESULTS: Chart review data usually are better for creating clinical quality indicators, although the level of agreement between the two methodologies often is quite high. Computerized patient record systems are found to be the most reliable automated data source, and automated claims are found to be the least reliable. This study's findings suggest that automated encounter systems may provide relatively reliable data.
CONCLUSIONS: Managed care plans may not want to rely on automated data alone for clinical quality measurement. The results reported here support the use of combined methodologies such as the "hybrid" method, which utilizes both automated and chart-review data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9191700     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199706000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  12 in total

Review 1.  HMO data systems in population studies of access to care.

Authors:  R Fink
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Key considerations when using health insurance claims data in advanced data analyses: an experience report.

Authors:  Renata Konrad; Wenchang Zhang; Margrét Bjarndóttir; Ruben Proaño
Journal:  Health Syst (Basingstoke)       Date:  2019-03-01

3.  Quality measures for the care of children with otitis media with effusion.

Authors:  Carole Lannon; Laura E Peterson; Anthony Goudie
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Documentation of contact precautions in an electronic health record.

Authors:  Bevin Cohen; Sarah A Clock; Elaine Larson; Maryam Behta; Barbara Ross; Reonel Saddul; David K Vawdrey
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2011 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.597

5.  The feasibility of using automated data to assess guideline-concordant care for schizophrenia.

Authors:  T J Hudson; R R Owen; A E Lancaster; L Mason
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.460

6.  Medicaid expenditures for children with autistic spectrum disorders: 1994 to 1999.

Authors:  David S Mandell; Jun Cao; Richard Ittenbach; Jennifer Pinto-Martin
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2006-05

Review 7.  Use of health care claims data to study patients with ophthalmologic conditions.

Authors:  Joshua D Stein; Flora Lum; Paul P Lee; William L Rich; Anne L Coleman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Treatment patterns for prostate cancer: comparison of Medicare claims data to medical record review.

Authors:  Steven T Fleming; Ann S Hamilton; Susan A Sabatino; Gretchen G Kimmick; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Jean B Owen; Bin Huang; Wenke Hwang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  How robust are health plan quality indicators to data loss? A Monte Carlo simulation study of pediatric asthma treatment.

Authors:  Bruce Stuart; Puneet K Singhal; Laurence S Magder; Ilene H Zuckerman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Method for developing national quality indicators based on manual data extraction from medical records.

Authors:  Melanie Couralet; Henri Leleu; Frederic Capuano; Leah Marcotte; Gérard Nitenberg; Claude Sicotte; Etienne Minvielle
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 7.035

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.