Literature DB >> 9191520

The impact of treatment factors on local control in T2-T3 anal carcinomas treated by radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy.

A S Allal1, B Mermillod, A D Roth, M C Marti, J M Kurtz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to investigate the influence of therapeutic parameters on local control (LC) in the sphincter-conserving treatment of T2-T3 anal carcinoma.
METHODS: From 1976 to 1993, 137 patients with anal carcinoma classified as T2 (85 patients) or T3 (52 patients) were treated curatively by radiotherapy (RT) alone (54 patients) or by concomitant chemotherapy and RT (83 patients). RT was delivered in two sequences, with a median gap of 46 days between the sequences. The first sequence was delivered at a median dose of 39.6 gray (Gy) using megavoltage photon beams. Boost treatment consisted of either 192Ir implantation or external beam RT (median dose, 20 Gy). Chemotherapy started on Day 1 and generally consisted of 1 cycle of mitomycin C (10 mg/m2) and a 5-day infusion of 5-fluorouracil (600-800 mg/m2/day). For surviving patients, median follow-up was 83 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine therapeutic parameters affecting LC after adjustment for clinical factors.
RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial LC was 76%. Factors associated with poorer LC (univariate) were as follows: age < 66 years (LC was 67% with the factor vs. 85% without), male gender (65% vs. 81%), tumor extent > 1/3 canal circumference (67% vs. 90%), lymph node involvement (64% vs. 81%), use of external beam boost (62% vs. 79%), and overall treatment time (OTT) > or = 75 days (69% vs. 85%). In multivariate analysis, no therapeutic parameters remained significant when adjusted for significant clinical factors, although OTT was of borderline significance (P = 0.09).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this multivariate analysis suggest that therapeutic factors have a less marked effect on LC compared with clinical parameters; the only factor that appeared to have some effect was OTT. Efforts to improve LC in patients with poor prognoses should concentrate on optimizing OTT and the chemotherapeutic aspects of treatment (in other words, attempts should be made to provide more effective agents and optimize scheduling).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9191520     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19970615)79:12<2329::aid-cncr6>3.0.co;2-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  13 in total

Review 1.  Anal carcinomas: the role of endoanal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in staging, response evaluation and follow-up.

Authors:  Jyoti Parikh; Aidan Shaw; Lee A Grant; Alexis M P Schizas; Vivek Datta; Andrew B Williams; Nyree Griffin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-10-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Advances in the Management of Anal Cancer.

Authors:  Diana R Julie; Karyn A Goodman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  Higher radiation dose with a shorter treatment duration improves outcome for locally advanced carcinoma of anal canal.

Authors:  Kim Huang; Daphne Haas-Kogan; Vivian Weinberg; Richard Krieg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Impact of overall treatment time on survival and local control in patients with anal cancer: a pooled data analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials 87-04 and 98-11.

Authors:  Edgar Ben-Josef; Jennifer Moughan; Jaffer A Ajani; Marshall Flam; Leonard Gunderson; JonDavid Pollock; Robert Myerson; Rani Anne; Seth A Rosenthal; Christopher Willett
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Chemo-radiation with or without mandatory split in anal carcinoma: experiences of two institutions and review of the literature.

Authors:  Christoph Oehler; Sawyna Provencher; David Donath; Jean-Paul Bahary; Urs M Lütolf; I Frank Ciernik
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.481

6.  Anal cancer treated with radio-chemotherapy: correlation between length of treatment interruption and outcome.

Authors:  Stefan Janssen; Jürgen Meier zu Eissen; Gerd Kolbert; Michael Bremer; Johann Hinrich Karstens; Andreas Meyer
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Factors Impacting Differential Outcomes in the Definitive Radiation Treatment of Anal Cancer Between HIV-Positive and HIV-Negative Patients.

Authors:  Matthew Susko; Chia-Ching Jackie Wang; Ann A Lazar; Stephanie Kim; Angela Laffan; Mary Feng; Andrew Ko; Alan P Venook; Chloe E Atreya; Katherine Van Loon; Mekhail Anwar
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-06-04

8.  IMRT for locally advanced anal cancer: clinical experience of the Montpellier Cancer Center.

Authors:  Sabine Vieillot; Pascal Fenoglietto; Claire Lemanski; Carmen Llacer Moscardo; Sophie Gourgou; Jean-Bernard Dubois; Norbert Aillères; David Azria
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Lymph node retrieval in abdominoperineal surgical specimen is radiation time-dependent.

Authors:  Alain Sermier; Pascal Gervaz; Jean F Egger; My Dao; Abdelkarim S Allal; Marta Bonet; Philippe Morel
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Impact of radiotherapy duration on overall survival in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus.

Authors:  Shahil Mehta; Stephen J Ramey; Deukwoo Kwon; Benjamin J Rich; Awad A Ahmed; Aaron Wolfson; Raphael Yechieli; Lorraine Portelance; Eric A Mellon
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.