Literature DB >> 9189130

Phase I/II clinical radioimmunotherapy with an iodine-131-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen murine monoclonal antibody IgG.

T M Behr1, R M Sharkey, M E Juweid, R M Dunn, R C Vagg, Z Ying, C H Zhang, L C Swayne, Y Vardi, J A Siegel, D M Goldenberg.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The aim of this study was to determine, in a Phase I/II clinical trial, the pharmacokinetics, dosimetry and toxicity, as well as antitumor activity, of the 131I-labeled murine anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) monoclonal antibody, NP-4 (IgG1 subtype).
METHODS: A total of 57 patients with CEA-expressing tumors (29 colorectal, 9 lung, 7 pancreas, 6 breast and 4 medullary thyroid cancer patients), mostly in very advanced stages, were treated. The patients underwent a diagnostic study (1-3 mg of IgG and 8-30 mCi of 131I) to assess tumor targeting and to estimate dosimetry, followed by the therapeutic dose (4-23 mg and 44-268 mCi), based on the radiation dose to the red marrow. Imaging was performed from 4-240 hr postinjection (planar and SPECT). Blood and whole-body clearance were determined; radiation doses were calculated by the Medical Internal Radiation Dose scheme.
RESULTS: Red marrow doses ranged from 45 to 706 cGy, and whole-body doses ranged from 31 to 344 cGy. Differences in pharmacokinetics were found between different types of CEA-producing tumors: blood T 1/2 was significantly lower in colorectal cancer when compared to all other tumor types (21.4 +/- 11.1 hr versus 35.8 +/- 13.2 hr, p < 0.01), as was also whole-body t 1/2. Myelotoxicity was dose-limiting, and its severity was related to the types of prior therapy and extent of bone marrow involvement. In patients without prior radiation or chemotherapy, marrow doses as high as 600 cGy were tolerated without evidence of dose-limiting toxicity. No major toxicity to other organs was observed. Tumor doses were inversely related to the tumor mass and ranged between 2 and 218 cGy/mCi. Modest antitumor effects were seen in 12 of 35 assessable patients (1 partial remission, 4 minor/mixed responses and 7 with stabilization of previously rapidly progressing disease).
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that prior chemotherapy or external beam radiation is an important risk factor for the development of hematological toxicity in radioimmunotherapy and that higher radiation doses may be delivered to tumors of patients without prior therapy compromising the bone marrow reserve. The different and, in the individual cases, unpredictable clearance rates suggest the necessity of dosimetry-based treatment planning rather than mCi/m2 dosing. Small tumors seem to be more suitable for radioimmunotherapy because of their favorable dosimetry, but to achieve better therapeutic results in patients with bulky disease, the application of higher, potentially myeloablative doses is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9189130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  17 in total

Review 1.  Have we overestimated the benefit of human(ized) antibodies?

Authors:  Daniel R Getts; Meghann T Getts; Derrick P McCarthy; Emily M L Chastain; Stephen D Miller
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 2.  Clinical radioimmunotherapy--the role of radiobiology.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pouget; Isabelle Navarro-Teulon; Manuel Bardiès; Nicolas Chouin; Guillaume Cartron; André Pèlegrin; David Azria
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Radioimmunotherapy of solid tumors: searching for the right target.

Authors:  Hong Song; George Sgouros
Journal:  Curr Drug Deliv       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 4.  Avoiding hepatic metastasis naturally: Lessons from the cotton top tamarin (Saguinus oedipus).

Authors:  Martin Tobi; Peter Thomas; Daniel Ezekwudo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Development of radioimmunotherapeutic and diagnostic antibodies: an inside-out view.

Authors:  C Andrew Boswell; Martin W Brechbiel
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2007-06-08       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 6.  Matched pairs dosimetry: 124I/131I metaiodobenzylguanidine and 124I/131I and 86Y/90Y antibodies.

Authors:  Egesta Lopci; Arturo Chiti; Maria Rita Castellani; Giovanna Pepe; Lidija Antunovic; Stefano Fanti; Emilio Bombardieri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy of colorectal cancer metastases: models and pharmacokinetics predict influence of the physical and radiochemical properties of the radionuclide.

Authors:  Eric Frampas; Catherine Maurel; Patricia Remaud-Le Saëc; Thibault Mauxion; Alain Faivre-Chauvet; François Davodeau; David M Goldenberg; Manuel Bardiès; Jacques Barbet
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Locoregional radioimmunotherapy in selected patients with malignant glioma: experiences, side effects and survival times.

Authors:  C Goetz; P Riva; G Poepperl; F J Gildehaus; A Hischa; K Tatsch; H J Reulen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 9.  Medullary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  E Kebebew; O H Clark
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2000-10

10.  Predictive patient-specific dosimetry and individualized dosing of pretargeted radioimmunotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Rafke Schoffelen; Wietske Woliner-van der Weg; Eric P Visser; David M Goldenberg; Robert M Sharkey; William J McBride; Chien-Hsing Chang; Edmund A Rossi; Winette T A van der Graaf; Wim J G Oyen; Otto C Boerman
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.