Literature DB >> 9187941

Classification and comparison of oral contraceptives containing new generation progestogens.

J R Newton1.   

Abstract

New generation-oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or gestodene, and possibly also norgestimate, are more or less similar with respect to contraceptive efficacy, cycle control and acceptability. They also show a more favourable metabolic profile in comparison with older preparations. The desogestrel-containing preparations Gracial and Marvelon, and possibly also the gestodene-containing preparation Gynera, have demonstrated a good efficacy in well-controlled studies in the treatment of mild to moderate acne and/or hirsutism. There may be differences between new generation oral contraceptives with respect to their effects on metabolic variables like high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and sex hormone-binding globulin. These differences are most probably modulated by variations in both the pharmacokinetics and selectivity of the progestogenic components. Of particular relevance here may be the recent finding that approximately 20% of administered norgestimate is metabolized into levonorgestrel. For use in clinical practice, it is of considerable help to have different preparations containing a range of oestrogen doses with the same progestogen. They allow the clinician to 'tailor make' the choice of oral contraceptives for those starting pill use or those switching to another combination due to symptomatology or changed circumstances, e.g. advancing age, smoking, etc. In this respect, desogestrel-containing oral contraceptives allow the most flexible approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 9187941     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/1.3.231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  6 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics of etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol released from a combined contraceptive vaginal ring.

Authors:  C J Timmer; T M Mulders
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Oral contraceptive use and estrogen/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer among African American women.

Authors:  Lynn Rosenberg; Deborah A Boggs; Lauren A Wise; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Julie R Palmer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Long-acting injectable hormonal dosage forms for contraception.

Authors:  Linfeng Wu; Dileep R Janagam; Timothy D Mandrell; James R Johnson; Tao L Lowe
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Longer duration of hormonal contraceptive use predicts better cognitive outcomes later in life.

Authors:  Kelly R Egan; Carey E Gleason
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 5.  Occlusive vascular diseases in oral contraceptive users. Epidemiology, pathology and mechanisms.

Authors:  I F Godsland; U Winkler; O Lidegaard; D Crook
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  A case-control study of oral contraceptive use and incident breast cancer.

Authors:  Lynn Rosenberg; Yuqing Zhang; Patricia F Coogan; Brian L Strom; Julie R Palmer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 4.897

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.