Literature DB >> 9187170

Preoperative spirometry and laparotomy: blowing away dollars.

L A De Nino1, V A Lawrence, E C Averyt, S G Hilsenbeck, R Dhanda, C P Page.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Increasing evidence indicates that routine preoperative diagnostic spirometry (pulmonary function tests [PFTs]) before elective abdominal surgery does not predict individual risk of postoperative pulmonary complications and is overutilized. This economic evaluation estimates potential savings from reduced use of preoperative PFTs.
DESIGN: Analyses of (1) real costs (resource consumption to perform tests) and (2) reimbursements (expenditures for charges) by third-party payers.
SETTING: University-affiliated public and Veterans Affairs hospitals. PATIENTS: Adults undergoing elective abdominal operations. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Average real cost of PFTs was $19.07 (95% confidence interval [CI], $18.53 to $19.61), based on a time and motion study. Average reimbursement expenditure by third-party payers for PFTs was $85 (range, $33 to $150; 95% CI, $68 to $103), based on Medicare payment of $52 and a survey of nine urban US hospitals with a spectrum of bed sizes and teaching status. Estimates from published literature included the following: (1) annual number of major abdominal operations, 3.5 million; and (2) proportion of PFTs not meeting current guidelines, 39% (95% CI, 0.31 to 0.47). Local data were used when estimates were not available in the literature: (1) proportion of laparotomies that are elective, 76% (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.79); and (2) frequency of PFTs before laparotomy, 69% (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.84). Estimated annual national real costs for preoperative PFTs are $25 million to $45 million. If use of PFTs were reduced by our estimate for the proportion of PFTs not meeting current guidelines, potential annual national cost savings would be $7,925,411 to $21,406,707. National reimbursement expenditures by third-party payers range from more than $90 million to more than $235 million. If use were reduced, potential annual savings in reimbursements would be $29,084,076 to $111,345,440. Potential savings to Medicare approach $8 million to $20 million annually.
CONCLUSION: Reduced use of PFTs before elective abdominal surgery could generate substantial savings. Current evidence indicates reduced use would not compromise patients' outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9187170     DOI: 10.1378/chest.111.6.1536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  5 in total

1.  Preoperative evaluation and risk management.

Authors:  David P Parsons
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2009-02

Review 2.  [Perioperative evaluation of lung function].

Authors:  M M Berger; R Gust
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia in older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: special considerations.

Authors:  Eva M Gruber; Edda M Tschernko
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Preoperative pulmonary function tests before low-risk surgery in Japan: a retrospective cohort study using a claims database.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yonekura; Kazuki Ide; Kahori Seto; Yohei Kawasaki; Shiro Tanaka; Isao Nahara; Chikashi Takeda; Koji Kawakami
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Correlation between intra-abdominal pressure and pulmonary volumes after superior and inferior abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Roberto de Cleva; Marianna Siqueira de Assumpção; Flavia Sasaya; Natalia Zuniaga Chaves; Marco Aurelio Santo; Claudia Fló; Adriana C Lunardi; Wilson Jacob Filho
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.365

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.