Literature DB >> 9186331

Does evaluation with the International Prostate Symptom Score predict the outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate?

O W Hakenberg1, C B Pinnock, V R Marshall.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined the reliability of the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) in predicting the outcome of transurethral prostatectomy and, therefore, how useful it can be in patient selection for surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective trial was done of 105 consecutive patients undergoing transurethral prostatectomy at our institution. Patients were assessed with the I-PSS before and 3 months after surgery. Flow rates and preoperative residual volumes also were measured.
RESULTS: There was significant postoperative improvement in all parameters of the symptom score and a change in symptom profile. Symptoms remaining with the greatest scores at 3 months postoperatively were frequency, urgency and nocturia. A significant correlation was found between I-PSS and quality of life before and after transurethral prostatectomy, and between postoperative improvement in flow rates and change in I-PSS. Patients with a greater preoperative I-PSS gained the most symptomatic benefit. The positive predictive value of a significant postoperative improvement of at least 7 I-PSS points depended on the preoperative I-PSS criteria applied. With a preoperative I-PSS of more than 17 the positive predictive value was 87% with a corresponding negative predictive value of 71%.
CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative I-PSS predicted a symptomatic improvement of more than 7 points with high sensitivity. The predictive value depends on the definition of significant improvement (magnitude of I-PSS change) and the level of I-PSS symptoms defined as sufficient to warrant transurethral prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9186331     DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199707000-00025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  5 in total

1.  Symptoms and urodynamics after unsuccessful transurethral prostatectomy.

Authors:  I Ignjatovic
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Change in storage symptoms following laser prostatectomy: comparison between photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).

Authors:  Min Chul Cho; Seung Beom Ha; Seung-June Oh; Soo Woong Kim; Jae-Seung Paick
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Outcome of surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia-is it predictable?

Authors:  Sanjay Gupta; Arun Gupta; Sudipta Saha; Lalatendu Mahapatra; Uk Srivastava
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-11-18

4.  Prognostic factors for acute toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with high-dose hypofractionated radiotherapy.

Authors:  V Macias; R Gonzalez Celador; C Marti-Macia; C Cigarral; L A Perez-Romasanta
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.405

5.  Comparison of prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomised, open label, non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Dominik Abt; Lukas Hechelhammer; Gautier Müllhaupt; Stefan Markart; Sabine Güsewell; Thomas M Kessler; Hans-Peter Schmid; Daniel S Engeler; Livio Mordasini
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-06-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.