Literature DB >> 9185951

Intrasexual competition and body weight dimorphism in anthropoid primates.

J M Plavcan1, C P van Schaik.   

Abstract

Body weight dimorphism in anthropoid primates has been thought to be a consequence of sexual selection resulting from male-male competition for access to mates. However, while monogamous anthropoids show low degrees of weight dimorphism, as predicted by the sexual selection hypothesis, polygynous anthropoids show high variation in weight dimorphism that is not associated with measures of mating system or sex ratio. This observation has led many to debate the role of other factors such as dietary constraints, predation pressure, substrate constraints, allometric effects, and phylogeny in the evolution of anthropoid weight dimorphism. Here, we re-evaluate variation in adult body weight dimorphism in anthropoids, testing the sexual selection hypothesis using categorical estimates of the degree of male-male intrasexual competition ("competition levels"). We also test the hypotheses that interspecific variation in body weight dimorphism is associated with female body weight and categorical estimates of diet, substrate use, and phylogeny. Weight dimorphism is strongly associated with competition levels, corroborating the sexual selection hypothesis. Weight dimorphism is positively correlated with increasing female body weight, but evidence suggests that the correlation reflects an interaction between overall size and behavior. Arboreal species are, on average, less dimorphic than terrestrial species, while more frugivorous species tend to be more dimorphic than folivorous or insectivorous species. Several alternative hypotheses can explain these latter results. Weight dimorphism is correlated with taxonomy, but so too are competition levels. We suggest that most taxonomic correlations of weight dimorphism represent "phylogenetic niche conservatism"; however, colobines show consistently low degrees of weight dimorphism for reasons that are not clear.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9185951     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199705)103:1<37::AID-AJPA4>3.0.CO;2-A

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  31 in total

1.  How quickly do brains catch up with bodies? A comparative method for detecting evolutionary lag.

Authors:  R O Deaner; C L Nunn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Equality for the sexes in human evolution? Early hominid sexual dimorphism and implications for mating systems and social behavior.

Authors:  Clark Spencer Larsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  From The Cover: Binocularity and brain evolution in primates.

Authors:  R A Barton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Methodological considerations for analyzing trabecular architecture: an example from the primate hand.

Authors:  Tracy L Kivell; Matthew M Skinner; Richard Lazenby; Jean-Jacques Hublin
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Variance in male lifetime reproductive success and estimation of the degree of polygyny in a primate.

Authors:  Constance Dubuc; Angelina Ruiz-Lambides; Anja Widdig
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.671

6.  Sexual ornaments but not weapons trade off against testes size in primates.

Authors:  Stefan Lüpold; Leigh W Simmons; Cyril C Grueter
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Sexual size dimorphism, canine dimorphism, and male-male competition in primates: where do humans fit in?

Authors:  J Michael Plavcan
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-03

8.  Genetic influences on the development of grip strength in adolescence.

Authors:  Joshua Isen; Matt McGue; William Iacono
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.868

Review 9.  Hominin life history: reconstruction and evolution.

Authors:  Shannen L Robson; Bernard Wood
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 10.  Does geometric morphometrics serve the needs of plasticity research?

Authors:  Katrin Schaefer; Fred L Bookstein
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.