Literature DB >> 9185434

Cost-effectiveness analysis of spinal cord stimulation in treatment of failed back surgery syndrome.

G K Bell1, D Kidd, R B North.   

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of the medical costs of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapy in the treatment of patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). We compared the medical costs of SCS therapy with an alternative regimen of surgeries and other interventions. Externally powered (external) and fully internalized (internal) SCS systems were considered separately. Clinical management models of each of the therapy alternatives were derived from the clinical literature, retrospective data sets, expert opinion, and published diagnostic and therapy protocols. No value was placed on pain relief or improvements in the quality of life that successful SCS therapy can generate. We found that by reducing the demand for medical care by FBSS patients, SCS therapy can lower medical costs. On average, given current screening and efficacy rates, SCS therapy pays for itself within 5.5 years. For those patients for whom SCS therapy is clinically efficacious, the therapy pays for itself within 2.1 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9185434     DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00323-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  10 in total

Review 1.  A rationale for the treatment algorithm of failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  S R Anderson
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Recent advances: control of chronic pain.

Authors:  T J Nurmikko; T P Nash; J R Wiles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-21

3.  Self-system therapy for distress associated with persistent low back pain: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sandra J Waters; Timothy J Strauman; Daphne C McKee; Lisa C Campbell; Rebecca A Shelby; Kim E Dixon; Anne Marie Fras; Francis J Keefe
Journal:  Psychother Res       Date:  2015-06-16

4.  Spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Leveque; Alan T Villavicencio; Ketan R Bulsara; Linda Rubin; John P Gorecki
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2001-01

5.  Dorsal column stimulator applications.

Authors:  Claudio Yampolsky; Santiago Hem; Damián Bendersky
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-10-31

Review 6.  Current and future trends in spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain.

Authors:  T R Deer
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2001-12

7.  A novel massage therapy technique for management of chronic cervical pain: a case series.

Authors:  William R Thompson; Ronald Carter; Benjamin Rohe; Randall L Duncan; Carlton R Cooper
Journal:  Int J Ther Massage Bodywork       Date:  2011-09-30

8.  Cost comparison among punctate midline myelotomy, intrathecal pain pump, and spinal cord epidural stimulator.

Authors:  Zaid Aljuboori; Kimberly Meyer; Mayur Sharma; Tyler Ball; Haring Nauta
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-02-18

9.  All-in-One Spinal Cord Stimulation in Lymphoproliferative Diseases.

Authors:  Antonello Sica; Beniamino Casale; Caterina Sagnelli; Maria Teresa Di Dato; Pietro Buonavolontà; Anna Maria Salzano; Evangelista Sagnelli; Vincenzo Famiglietti; Elisabetta Saracco; Dario Tammaro; Alfonso Papa
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Evaluation of intradural stimulation efficiency and selectivity in a computational model of spinal cord stimulation.

Authors:  Bryan Howell; Shivanand P Lad; Warren M Grill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.