Literature DB >> 9185235

The neurobiology of placebo analgesia: from endogenous opioids to cholecystokinin.

F Benedetti1, M Amanzio.   

Abstract

Placebo is a widespread phenomenon in medicine and biology and its mechanisms are understood only partially. Most of our understanding of placebo comes from studies on pain. In particular, placebo analgesia represents a situation where the administration of a substance known to be non-analgesic produces an analgesic response when the subject is told that it is a pain killer. Several theories try to explain this effect by means of anxiety mechanisms, cognitive processes and classical conditioning. However, the placebo response is bidirectional, i.e. analgesic and algesic. In fact, if a subject is told that the ineffective substance is a hyperalgesic drug, a pain increase may occur. The negative effects of placebo are called nocebo and, in extreme cases, they lead to severe pathological conditions. The neurobiology of placebo was born when some authors discovered that placebo analgesia is mediated by endogenous opioids. This claim comes from the observation that the opioid antagonist naloxone can reverse placebo analgesia. On the basis of the discovery of the anti-opioid action of the neuropeptide cholecystokinin, recent studies demonstrate that the blockade of cholecystokinin receptors potentiates the placebo analgesic response, thus suggesting an inhibitory role of cholecystokinin in placebo analgesia. Thus, by antagonizing the anti-opioid action of cholecystokinin during a placebo procedure, a potentiation of the endogenous opioid systems can be obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9185235     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-0082(97)00006-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Neurobiol        ISSN: 0301-0082            Impact factor:   11.685


  33 in total

Review 1.  Functional imaging of pain perception.

Authors:  Anthony K P Jones; Bhavna Kulkarni; Stuart W G Derbyshire
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  Nocebo in headaches: implications for clinical practice and trial design.

Authors:  Dimos D Mitsikostas
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Getting the pain you expect: mechanisms of placebo, nocebo and reappraisal effects in humans.

Authors:  Irene Tracey
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 4.  The Insula: A "Hub of Activity" in Migraine.

Authors:  David Borsook; Rosanna Veggeberg; Nathalie Erpelding; Ronald Borra; Clas Linnman; Rami Burstein; Lino Becerra
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 7.519

5.  Unexpected placebo response in premenstrual dysphoric disorder: implication of endogenous opioids.

Authors:  Jan M Van Ree; Jules H Schagen Van Leeuwen; Hans P Koppeschaar; Egbert R Te Velde
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  The status and future of acupuncture mechanism research.

Authors:  Vitaly Napadow; Andrew Ahn; John Longhurst; Lixing Lao; Elisabet Stener-Victorin; Richard Harris; Helene M Langevin
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.579

7.  Importance of placebo effect in cough clinical trials.

Authors:  Ron Eccles
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 8.  Sex, gender, and pain: women and men really are different.

Authors:  R B Fillingim
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

9.  Academic physicians use placebos in clinical practice and believe in the mind-body connection.

Authors:  Rachel Sherman; John Hickner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-11-10       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  The placebo effect: plugging the nostrils of unmet needs.

Authors:  James N Baraniuk
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.806

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.