Literature DB >> 9184405

Potentially clinically important inaccuracies in testing for the lupus anticoagulant: an analysis of results from three surveys of the UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) for Blood Coagulation.

I Jennings1, S Kitchen, T A Woods, F E Preston, M Greaves.   

Abstract

The identification of the presence of antiphospholipid in plasma is recognised to be of diagnostic and prognostic importance in subjects with thrombotic disease, recurrent miscarriage or collagen vascular disorders. A number of coagulation assays are currently employed for the detection of lupus anticoagulant (LA), many of which are influenced by reagent dependent and methodological variables. In the present study lyophilised plasma samples from three subjects with "strong", "weak" and "absent" LA were tested in 220 centres. The most commonly used tests for LA were Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT), Dilute Russell Viper Venom Time (DRVVT) and Kaolin CLotting Time (KCT). Median DRVVT ratios were 1.75, 1.17 and 1.10 for the three samples. The presence of a strong LA was not detected by 4% of laboratories. The correct diagnosis was made by 94% of users of DRVVT and 85% of users of KCT. A weak LA was not detected by over half of centres. Correction was observed on addition of plasma and also in platelet neutralisation. The correct diagnosis was made by 37% of users of DRVVT and 27% of users of KCT. Lupus Anticoagulant was falsely considered to be present in a Factor IX deficient plasma by approximately one quarter of laboratories. Amongst users of DRVVT and KCT absence of LA in this sample was correctly reported by 73% and 69% of centres respectively. The accuracy of testing for LA in the present study is suboptimal and this is likely to have important clinical consequences. There is clearly a need for greater conformity in the selection and performance of LA tests to facilitate accurate diagnosis of this important group of disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9184405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  7 in total

Review 1.  The use of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of SLE.

Authors:  W Egner
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Antiphospholipid syndrome.

Authors:  M Greaves
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Rare case of acquired haemophilia and lupus anticoagulant.

Authors:  Devika Gupta; Tathagat Chatterjee; Ajay Sharma; Prosenjit Ganguli; Satyaranjan Das; Sanjeevan Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 0.900

Review 4.  Laboratory diagnosis of the lupus anticoagulant.

Authors:  Thomas L Ortel
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Activated protein C resistance, thrombophilia, and inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  M A Heneghan; B Cleary; M Murray; T A O'Gorman; C F McCarthy
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Combining Taipan snake venom time/Ecarin time screening with the mixing studies of conventional assays increases detection rates of lupus anticoagulants in orally anticoagulated patients.

Authors:  Gary W Moore
Journal:  Thromb J       Date:  2007-09-06

Review 7.  A Simplified Understanding of the Black Swan: Anti-phospholipid Antibody Syndrome.

Authors:  Binit Vaidya; Shweta Nakarmi; Rakshya Joshi; Rikesh Baral
Journal:  JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.406

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.