Literature DB >> 9183142

Magnetic resonance imaging of children without sedation: preparation with simulation.

D R Rosenberg1, J A Sweeney, J S Gillen, J Kim, M J Varanelli, K M O'Hearn, P A Erb, D Davis, K R Thulborn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It was hypothesized that a scanner simulator that replicates the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) environment could be used to prepare pediatric subjects for successful completion of a diagnostic-quality MRI examination without pharmacological sedation.
METHOD: Sixteen healthy children, 6 to 17 years of age, were matched for age and sex with 16 psychotropic medication-naive children with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Distress was measured throughout simulation and scanning procedures using heart rate and a self-report distress scale. Ten healthy children, 6 to 17 years of age, also underwent the same actual MRI scanning procedure but did not undergo the simulation scanning procedure.
RESULTS: Significant decreases in heart rate and self-reported distress level were observed in all subjects during the simulator session that were maintained to the end of the actual scanner experience. All subjects successfully completed MRI examinations without chemical restraint. Subjects who were not trained in the simulator had higher heart rates and self-reported distress levels in the actual scanner than did simulation-trained subjects.
CONCLUSIONS: Simulation without pharmacological sedation successfully prepared pediatric subjects in this pilot study for high-quality MRI studies. Subject preparation may be an alternative procedure to sedation for routine MRI examination in healthy and anxious children 6 years of age and older.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9183142     DOI: 10.1097/00004583-199706000-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry        ISSN: 0890-8567            Impact factor:   8.829


  48 in total

1.  Brain-behavior correlation in children depends on the neurocognitive network.

Authors:  James R Booth; Douglas D Burman; Joel R Meyer; Barbara L Trommer; Nicholas D Davenport; Todd B Parrish; Darren R Gitelman; M Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Development of brain mechanisms for processing orthographic and phonologic representations.

Authors:  James R Booth; Douglas D Burman; Joel R Meyer; Darren R Gitelman; Todd B Parrish; M Marsel Mesulam
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Diffusion tensor imaging of the normal pediatric spinal cord using an inner field of view echo-planar imaging sequence.

Authors:  N Barakat; F B Mohamed; L N Hunter; P Shah; S H Faro; A F Samdani; J Finsterbusch; R Betz; J Gaughan; M J Mulcahey
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 4.  Considerations for imaging the adolescent brain.

Authors:  Adriana Galván; Linda Van Leijenhorst; Kristine M McGlennen
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 6.464

5.  Differential prefrontal-temporal neural correlates of semantic processing in children.

Authors:  Henrike K Blumenfeld; James R Booth; Douglas D Burman
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Preparing children for MRI.

Authors:  Frank P Macmaster; David R Rosenberg
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2007-12-21

7.  Maturational changes in anterior cingulate and frontoparietal recruitment support the development of error processing and inhibitory control.

Authors:  Katerina Velanova; Mark E Wheeler; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Empirical examination of the potential adverse psychological effects associated with pediatric FMRI scanning.

Authors:  Tomer Shechner; Naomi Wakschlag; Jennifer C Britton; Johanna Jarcho; Monique Ernst; Daniel S Pine
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.576

9.  Prediction of compliance with MRI procedures among children of ages 3 years to 12 years.

Authors:  Glenn D Cahoon; Tanya E Davison
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-05-24

Review 10.  The adolescent brain: insights from functional neuroimaging research.

Authors:  Monique Ernst; Sven C Mueller
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.964

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.