Literature DB >> 9182536

Identification of domains conferring ligand binding specificity to the prostanoid receptor. Studies on chimeric prostacyclin/prostaglandin D receptors.

T Kobayashi1, M Kiriyama, T Hirata, M Hirata, F Ushikubi, S Narumiya.   

Abstract

To identify domains conferring ligand binding specificity to prostanoid receptors, we constructed a series of chimeric receptors by successively replacing the regions from the carboxyl-terminal tail of mouse prostacyclin (prostaglandin I (PGI)) receptor (mIP) with the corresponding regions of the mouse PGD receptor (mDP). The mIP receptor expressed in COS 7 cells bound [3H]iloprost, a PGI2 analog, and [3H]PGE1 with Kd values of 13 and 27 nM, respectively. This receptor did not bind [3H]PGD2, [3H]PGE2, and [3H]PGF2alpha. The mDP receptor bound only [3H]PGD2 with a Kd value of 43 nM. The chimeric IPN-VII/DPC receptor with replacement of the carboxyl tail of the mIP receptor with that of the mDP receptor showed 12-16-fold higher affinities for [3H]iloprost and [3H]PGE1 than the mIP receptor. The region extending from the sixth transmembrane domain to the carboxyl terminus of the mIP receptor was next replaced with the corresponding region of the mDP receptor. This chimeric IPN-V/DPVI-C receptor acquired the ability to bind [3H]PGD2 and [3H]PGE2 without decreasing the affinities of the mIP receptor to [3H]iloprost and [3H]PGE1. These binding characteristics did not change when the fourth and fifth transmembrane domains of the mIP receptor were further replaced with the corresponding regions of the mDP receptor. However, when the first extracellular to second intracellular loop of the mIP receptor containing the third transmembrane domain was further replaced with those of the mDP receptor, the affinities for [3H]PGE1, [3H]PGE2, and [3H]iloprost were markedly decreased, whereas that for [3H]PGD2 was increased by about 2-fold. [3H]PGF2alpha showed no affinity for the mIP, mDP, and all the chimeric receptors. These results suggest that the sixth to seventh transmembrane domain of the mIP receptor confers the specificity of this receptor to bind selectively to PGE1 and not to PGE2 and that the third transmembrane domain of the mDP receptor confers the selective binding of PGD2 to this receptor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9182536     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.272.24.15154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  5 in total

1.  Prediction of the 3D structure and dynamics of human DP G-protein coupled receptor bound to an agonist and an antagonist.

Authors:  Youyong Li; Fangqiang Zhu; Nagarajan Vaidehi; William A Goddard; Felix Sheinerman; Stephan Reiling; Isabelle Morize; Lan Mu; Keith Harris; Ali Ardati; Abdelazize Laoui
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2007-08-11       Impact factor: 15.419

2.  Molecular basis for agonist selectivity and activation of the orphan bombesin receptor subtype 3 receptor.

Authors:  Nieves Gonzalez; Simon J Hocart; Sergio Portal-Nuñez; Samuel A Mantey; Tomoo Nakagawa; Enrique Zudaire; David H Coy; Robert T Jensen
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Identification by site-directed mutagenesis of amino acids contributing to ligand-binding specificity or signal transduction properties of the human FP prostanoid receptor.

Authors:  Frank Neuschäfer-Rube; Eva Engemaier; Sina Koch; Ulrike Böer; Gerhard P Püschel
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CIX. Differences and Similarities between Human and Rodent Prostaglandin E2 Receptors (EP1-4) and Prostacyclin Receptor (IP): Specific Roles in Pathophysiologic Conditions.

Authors:  Xavier Norel; Yukihiko Sugimoto; Gulsev Ozen; Heba Abdelazeem; Yasmine Amgoud; Amel Bouhadoun; Wesam Bassiouni; Marie Goepp; Salma Mani; Hasanga D Manikpurage; Amira Senbel; Dan Longrois; Akos Heinemann; Chengcan Yao; Lucie H Clapp
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 5.  Molecular mechanisms of target recognition by lipid GPCRs: relevance for cancer.

Authors:  M T M van Jaarsveld; J M Houthuijzen; E E Voest
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 9.867

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.