Literature DB >> 9181628

Effect of egg size and strain and age of hens on the solids content of chicken eggs.

D U Ahn1, S M Kim, H Shu.   

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine the effect of egg size and the age and strain of hens on the content of egg solids. Eggs were obtained from commercial farms from four strains of hens with similar age groups and received diets formulated to contain the same dietary energy and protein levels across the strains within a farm. Eggs were collected on 2 different d when the flocks reached the average ages of 28, 55, 75, and 97 wk. The eggs collected form each farm were pooled and sorted by size. Each individual egg was used as a replicate for yolk:white ratio; however, five yolks, five whites, and five whole eggs from each strain at each age period were pooled, homogenized, and then used as a replicate to determine the solids contents of yolk, white, and whole eggs. The yolk:white ratio of eggs from 28-wk-old hens was the lowest, that from 55- and 78-wk-old hens was the highest, and that from 97-wk-old hens was intermediate; however, the solids content (percentage) of whole eggs increased with the age of the hens. The solids content of egg white was highest in eggs from 28-wk-old hens. The white solids content of extra large eggs was greater than that of medium eggs, and yolk solids increased with egg size; however, the solids of whole egg were not affected by egg size. The strain of hens had a significant effect on the solids of whole egg, white, and yolk; however, the strain effect on yolk:white ratio was not significant. The results showed that young (28-wk-old) and old birds (97-wk-old) produced eggs with low solids content and intermediate aged hens (55- to 78-wk-old) produced eggs with high solids content. Therefore, it may be more beneficial for egg producers and processors to use young (28-wk-old) and old birds (97-wk-old) for table egg production and birds of intermediate age (55- to 78-wk-old) for liquid egg production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9181628     DOI: 10.1093/ps/76.6.914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  7 in total

1.  Effects of poor plumage conditions on egg production, antioxidant status and gene expression in laying hens.

Authors:  Junying Li; Chengjie Zhang; Ruiyu Ma; Renrong Qi; Yi Wan; Wei Liu; Tao Zhao; Yan Li; Kai Zhan
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Determination of yolk:white ratio of egg using SDS-PAGE.

Authors:  Reyhan Selin Uysal; Esra Acar-Soykut; Ismail Hakki Boyaci
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 2.391

Review 3.  Egg yolk lipids: separation, characterization, and utilization.

Authors:  Edirisingha Dewage Nalaka Sandun Abeyrathne; Ki-Chang Nam; Xi Huang; Dong Uk Ahn
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.231

4.  Food composition tables in resource-poor settings: exploring current limitations and opportunities, with a focus on animal-source foods in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Julia de Bruyn; Elaine Ferguson; Margaret Allman-Farinelli; Ian Darnton-Hill; Wende Maulaga; John Msuya; Robyn Alders
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 3.718

5.  A comparison of intestinal integrity, digestive function, and egg quality in laying hens with different ages.

Authors:  Y F Gu; Y P Chen; R Jin; C Wang; C Wen; Y M Zhou
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Evaluation of the efficacy of a novel phytase in short-term digestibility and long-term egg production studies with laying hens.

Authors:  H X Zhai; J P Wang; Q Zhang; R Aureli; A Tschambser; M Umar Faruk
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.014

7.  Maternal age and maternal environment affect egg composition, yolk testosterone, offspring growth and behaviour in laying hens.

Authors:  Tina M Widowski; Leanne Cooley; Simone Hendriksen; Mariana Roedel Lopez Vieira Peixoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.