E C Rodríguez-Merchán1. 1. Service of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of treating unstable distal radius fractures either by percutaneous pinning and casting, or by traditional closed reduction and casting. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized. SETTING:University hospital. PATIENTS: Forty patients with unstable Frykmann III-VIII distal radius fractures resulting from a fall. INTERVENTIONS:Twenty patients were treated with closed reduction, consisting of manipulation, under local anesthesia, followed by casting. Twenty patients were treated withpercutaneous fixation using K-wires, followed by casting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Initial displacement, quality of reduction, carpal malalignment, articular step-off. Range of motion and grip strength were measured using a scoring system reported by Home et al. (10). RESULTS: Functional results in the pinning group were better (excellent, 12; good, 6; fair, 2) than in the plaster group (excellent, 3; good, 8; fair, 5; poor, 4). Anatomic results also were better in the pinning group. CONCLUSION: The best anatomic and functional results were obtained by percutaneous pinning. Although the cost of pins and plaster treatment is significantly greater than plaster treatment, the author believes that the positive end result justifies the cost.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of treating unstable distal radius fractures either by percutaneous pinning and casting, or by traditional closed reduction and casting. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Forty patients with unstable Frykmann III-VIII distal radius fractures resulting from a fall. INTERVENTIONS: Twenty patients were treated with closed reduction, consisting of manipulation, under local anesthesia, followed by casting. Twenty patients were treated with percutaneous fixation using K-wires, followed by casting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Initial displacement, quality of reduction, carpal malalignment, articular step-off. Range of motion and grip strength were measured using a scoring system reported by Home et al. (10). RESULTS: Functional results in the pinning group were better (excellent, 12; good, 6; fair, 2) than in the plaster group (excellent, 3; good, 8; fair, 5; poor, 4). Anatomic results also were better in the pinning group. CONCLUSION: The best anatomic and functional results were obtained by percutaneous pinning. Although the cost of pins and plaster treatment is significantly greater than plaster treatment, the author believes that the positive end result justifies the cost.
Authors: Taylor Woolnough; Daniel Axelrod; Anthony Bozzo; Alex Koziarz; Frank Koziarz; Colby Oitment; Lauren Gyemi; Jessica Gormley; Kyle Gouveia; Herman Johal Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 4.755
Authors: Vili Palola; Ville Ponkilainen; Tuomas Huttunen; Antti Launonen; Ville M Mattila Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg Date: 2020-08-30 Impact factor: 3.067