Literature DB >> 9181425

Development of a tool to rate the quality assessment of randomized controlled trials using a Delphi technique.

F Sindhu1, L Carpenter, K Seers.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a quality of study tool rate the methodological quality of individual primary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to be included in a meta-analysis. A Delphi-technique using several rounds of questions to seek consensus, among trialists, on criteria important in a RCT was used. Eight trialists formed the Delphi panel. The developed quality of study tool consisted of 53 items in 15 dimensions. The tool was tested for reliability and validity. Unlike many other quality assessment tools, the developed tool may be used to rate numerically each primary study. This is important in reviews or in meta-analyses where one objective may be to ascertain whether those studies of a higher quality exhibit different results to reviewing studies of lower quality. The tool needs further testing.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9181425     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.19970251262.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0309-2402            Impact factor:   3.187


  13 in total

1.  Editors' Perspectives on Enhancing Manuscript Quality and Editorial Decisions Through Peer Review and Reviewer Development.

Authors:  Kristin K Janke; Andrew S Bzowyckyj; Andrew P Traynor
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 2.  Coeliac disease and oats: a systematic review.

Authors:  N Y Haboubi; S Taylor; S Jones
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 3.  Efficacy and comorbidity of oral appliances in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea: a systematic review and preliminary results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  Aarnoud Hoekema
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.816

Review 4.  Inconsistency in the items included in tools used in general health research and physical therapy to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials: a descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Susan Armijo-Olivo; Jorge Fuentes; Maria Ospina; Humam Saltaji; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 5.  Oral Interventions for Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Vasiliki Koretsi; Theodore Eliades; Spyridon N Papageorgiou
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Evaluating the role of quality assessment of primary studies in systematic reviews of cancer practice guidelines.

Authors:  Melissa C Brouwers; Mary E Johnston; Manya L Charette; Steve E Hanna; Alejandro R Jadad; George P Browman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Evaluating the quality of randomized controlled trials that examine the efficacy of natural health products: a systematic review of critical appraisal instruments.

Authors:  Anne Marie Whelan; Tannis M Jurgens; Lindsay Lord
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products.

Authors:  Tannis Jurgens; Anne Marie Whelan; Melissa MacDonald; Lindsay Lord
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.659

9.  An exploration of the use of simple statistics to measure consensus and stability in Delphi studies.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Holey; Jennifer L Feeley; John Dixon; Vicki J Whittaker
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 10.  A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools.

Authors:  Persis Katrak; Andrea E Bialocerkowski; Nicola Massy-Westropp; Saravana Kumar; Karen A Grimmer
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.