Literature DB >> 9180616

Factors contributing to practice variation in post-stroke rehabilitation.

A J Lee1, J H Huber, W B Stason.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze geographic variability in the utilization and cost of post-stroke medical care using multiple linear regression. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: A 20 percent random sample of Medicare beneficiaries with an admission to an acute care hospital for stroke during the first six months of 1991, supplemented by data from their Medicare claims and beneficiary records, the Medicare Cost Reports for hospitals and nursing homes, and the Area Resource File. STUDY
DESIGN: Weighted least squares regression is used to analyze variations in post-stroke practice patterns across 151 MSAs (Metropolitan Statistical Areas). Average post-stroke costs, utilization rates, and facility lengths of stay are regressed on patient and market characteristics. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: For a six-month post-stroke interval, beneficiary-level post-stroke costs and service utilization are averaged by MSA. Variables describing market conditions are then added to these MSA-level records. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Patient variables rarely explain more than a third of practice variation, and often they explain substantially less than that. Market variables (with some exception) tend to be relatively less important. Finally, one-half to two-thirds of the practice variation across MSAs is unexplained by the patient and market factors measured in our data.
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial portion of inter-MSA variability in utilization and intensity of post-stroke rehabilitation services cannot be explained by differences in patient characteristics. Given the large practice differences observed across MSAs, it seems unlikely that unmeasured patient differences can account for much more of the practice differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9180616      PMCID: PMC1070181     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  7 in total

Review 1.  Small area variations: a critical review of propositions, methods, and evidence.

Authors:  S Folland; M Stano
Journal:  Med Care Rev       Date:  1990

2.  Poststroke rehabilitation in older Americans. The Medicare experience.

Authors:  A J Lee; J Huber; W B Stason
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Small area variations in health care delivery.

Authors:  J Wennberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Patient-related predictors of rehabilitation use for community-dwelling older Americans.

Authors:  S A Mayer-Oakes; H Hoenig; K A Atchison; J E Lubben; F De Jong; S O Schweitzer
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Rehabilitation after hip fracture--equal opportunity for all?

Authors:  H Hoenig; L Rubenstein; K Kahn
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Nursing home reimbursement and the allocation of rehabilitation therapy resources.

Authors:  C M Murtaugh; L M Cooney; R R DerSimonian; H L Smits; R B Fetter
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Prospective payment system and other effects on post-hospital services.

Authors:  F D Gianfrancesco
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1990
  7 in total
  11 in total

1.  Effects of payment changes on trends in post-acute care.

Authors:  Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin; Carrie Hoverman Colla; José J Escarce
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Clinical management of fever by nurses: doing what works.

Authors:  Hilaire J Thompson; Sarah H Kagan
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  How much is postacute care use affected by its availability?

Authors:  Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin; Anita Datar Garten; Susan Paddock; Debra Saliba; Mark Totten; José J Escarce
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Improving quality in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Nizar Dowla; Leighton Chan
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.119

Review 5.  Stroke care: how do we measure quality?

Authors:  Kieran Walsh; P H Gompertz; A G Rudd
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Use of physical and occupational therapy by Medicare beneficiaries within five conditions: 1994-2001.

Authors:  Long Ngo; Nancy K Latham; Alan M Jette; Jane Soukup; Lisa I Iezzoni
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.159

7.  Impact of the BBA on post-acute utilization.

Authors:  B Gage
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1999

8.  Physiatrist referral preferences for postacute stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  David J Cormier; Megan A Frantz; Ethan Rand; Joel Stein
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Process skill rather than motor skill seems to be a predictor of costs for rehabilitation after a stroke in working age; a longitudinal study with a 1 year follow up post discharge.

Authors:  Ann Björkdahl; Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Translating clinicians' beliefs into implementation interventions (TRACII): a protocol for an intervention modeling experiment to change clinicians' intentions to implement evidence-based practice.

Authors:  Martin P Eccles; Marie Johnston; Susan Hrisos; Jill Francis; Jeremy Grimshaw; Nick Steen; Eileen F Kaner
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.