Literature DB >> 9180383

Efficacy of oral irinotecan against neuroblastoma xenografts.

J Thompson1, W C Zamboni, P J Cheshire, L Richmond, X Luo, J A Houghton, C F Stewart, P J Houghton.   

Abstract

The efficacy of the topoisomerase I inhibitor, 7-ethyl-10-(4-[1-piperidino]-1-piperidino)-carbonyloxy-camptotheci n (irinotecan, CPT-11), administered by oral gavage has been examined against a panel of six independently derived neuroblastoma xenografts. Irinotecan was administered either daily for 5 days on 12 consecutive weeks ¿(d x 5)12¿ or for 5 days on two consecutive weeks repeated every 21 days for 4 cycles ¿[(d x 5)2]4¿. Given on the (d x 5)12 schedule the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 50 mg/kg. For intermittent scheduling ¿[(d x 5)2]4¿, the MTD was 75 mg/kg, resulting in the same total dose being administered (3 g/kg) over the period of treatment. At the MTD for the 12 consecutive week schedule there were two of 42 toxicity related deaths, whereas intermittent scheduling at the MTD resulted in none of 42 deaths. The intermittent schedule ¿[(d x 5)2]4¿ was less toxic than therapy given (d x 5)12, as at the end of treatment mice weighed 92 +/- 4% (SD; n = 6 experiments) and 81 +/- 4% (SD; n = 6 experiments) of their body weight at the start of therapy, respectively. The latter schedule was associated with loose feces starting around week 8 of therapy, broken teeth and a high incidence of swelling of the orbital conjunctiva that developed late in the course of therapy. Given (d x 5)12, irinotecan caused complete regressions of all six neuroblastoma xenograft lines. Because mice tolerate significantly greater systemic exposure to SN-38 lactone than do patients (as determined by plasma AUC at the respective MTD), we evaluated the intermittent schedule of administration, reducing the dose/administration to determine the lowest dose levels that produced objective regressions of these neuroblastoma xenografts and determined the daily systemic exposure associated with these dose levels. In four lines examined objective responses were obtained at dose levels of 12.5 or 6.25 mg/kg. The daily plasma AUC exposures associated with minimum dose achieving response in NB1691 (12.5 mg/kg), NB1643 (6.25 mg/kg) and NBEB (12.5 mg/kg) for irinotecan lactone were 219, 152 and 653 ng-h/ml, respectively; and for SN-38 lactone were 704, 418 and 987 ng-h/ml, respectively. These results indicate that childhood neuroblastoma xenografts are highly sensitive to irinotecan given by oral administration and therapeutic activity is similar to i.v. irinotecan administered on similar schedules.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9180383     DOI: 10.1097/00001813-199704000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  10 in total

1.  TrkB inhibition by GNF-4256 slows growth and enhances chemotherapeutic efficacy in neuroblastoma xenografts.

Authors:  Jamie L Croucher; Radhika Iyer; Nanxin Li; Valentina Molteni; Jon Loren; W Perry Gordon; Tove Tuntland; Bo Liu; Garrett M Brodeur
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.333

2.  Tumor dosimetry using [124I]m-iodobenzylguanidine microPET/CT for [131I]m-iodobenzylguanidine treatment of neuroblastoma in a murine xenograft model.

Authors:  Youngho Seo; W Clay Gustafson; Shorouk F Dannoon; Erin A Nekritz; Chang-Lae Lee; Stephanie T Murphy; Henry F VanBrocklin; Miguel Hernandez-Pampaloni; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; William A Weiss; Katherine K Matthay
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Nanoparticle delivery of an SN38 conjugate is more effective than irinotecan in a mouse model of neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Radhika Iyer; Jamie L Croucher; Michael Chorny; Jennifer L Mangino; Ivan S Alferiev; Robert J Levy; Venkatadri Kolla; Garrett M Brodeur
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 8.679

4.  A single-arm pilot phase II study of gefitinib and irinotecan in children with newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Wayne L Furman; Lisa M McGregor; M Beth McCarville; Mihaela Onciu; Andrew M Davidoff; Sandy Kovach; Dana Hawkins; Valerie McPherson; Peter J Houghton; Catherine A Billups; Jianrong Wu; Clinton F Stewart; Victor M Santana
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.850

5.  Evaluation of ABT-751 against childhood cancer models in vivo.

Authors:  Christopher L Morton; Edward G Favours; Kimberly S Mercer; Claire R Boltz; Jeri Carol Crumpton; Chandra Tucker; Catherine A Billups; Peter J Houghton
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 3.850

6.  Phase I trial of oral irinotecan and temozolomide for children with relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma: a new approach to neuroblastoma therapy consortium study.

Authors:  Lars M Wagner; Judith G Villablanca; Clinton F Stewart; Kristine R Crews; Susan Groshen; C Patrick Reynolds; Julie R Park; John M Maris; Randall A Hawkins; Heike E Daldrup-Link; Hollie A Jackson; Katherine K Matthay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Pre-Clinical Evaluation of rHDL Encapsulated Retinoids for the Treatment of Neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Nirupama Sabnis; Suraj Pratap; Irina Akopova; Paul W Bowman; Andras G Lacko
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.418

8.  CPT11 with P-glycoprotein/CYP 3A4 dual-function inhibitor by self-nanoemulsifying nanoemulsion combined with gastroretentive technology to enhance the oral bioavailability and therapeutic efficacy against pancreatic adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Ling-Chun Chen; Wei-Jie Cheng; Shyr-Yi Lin; Ming-Tse Hung; Ming-Thau Sheu; Hong-Liang Lin; Chien-Ming Hsieh
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 6.419

9.  Secreted and tumour targeted human carboxylesterase for activation of irinotecan.

Authors:  D Oosterhoff; H M Pinedo; I H van der Meulen; M de Graaf; T Sone; F A Kruyt; V W van Beusechem; H J Haisma; W R Gerritsen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-09-09       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  No topoisomerase I alteration in a neuroblastoma model with in vivo acquired resistance to irinotecan.

Authors:  L Calvet; A Santos; A Valent; M-J Terrier-Lacombe; P Opolon; J-L Merlin; G Aubert; J Morizet; J H M Schellens; J Bénard; G Vassal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.