Literature DB >> 9180228

Mandibular third molar surgery with primary closure and tube drain.

S Rakprasitkul1, V Pairuchvej.   

Abstract

The insertion of a small surgical tube drain with primary wound closure (drain group) was compared to a simple primary wound closure (no drain group) after removal of impacted third molars. Surgery was performed on 23 patients in a randomized cross-over fashion. The operation time was found to be significantly longer and mouth opening significantly wider in the immediate postoperative period in the drain group subjects as compared to the no drain group (P > or = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the severity of pain between the two groups. Facial swelling was found to be significantly less in the drain group subjects (P > or = 0.01). The number of patients with wound breakdown, edema, and bleeding was found to be less in the drain group than in the no drain group. Thus, the postoperative problems, in general, were less in the small surgical drain group as compared to the no drain group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9180228     DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(97)80817-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  26 in total

Review 1.  Management of inflammatory complications in third molar surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  O D Osunde; R A Adebola; U K Omeje
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.927

2.  Comparison of primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

Authors:  Anisha Maria; Murtuza Malik; Parag Virang
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-09-23

3.  The effect of alloplastic bone graft and absorbable gelatin sponge in prevention of periodontal defects on the distal aspect of mandibular second molars, after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar: a comparative prospective study.

Authors:  Manju Singh; Kalyani Bhate; Deepak Kulkarni; S N Santhosh Kumar; Rahul Kathariya
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2013-11-14

4.  Comparative study of primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

Authors:  Pavan Kumar Pachipulusu; Manjula S
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-05-23

Review 5.  Impacted wisdom teeth.

Authors:  Thomas B Dodson; Srinivas M Susarla
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2010-04-08

6.  Comparative Evaluation of Immediate Post-Operative Sequelae after Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar with or without Tube Drain - Split-Mouth Study.

Authors:  Barun Kumar; Kalyani Bhate; R S Dolas; Sn Santhosh Kumar; Pushkar Waknis
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-12-01

7.  Mandibular third molar impactions in male adults: Relationship of Operative time and Types of impaction on inflammatory complications.

Authors:  Samir Mansuri; Abdul Mujeeb; Seema Abid Hussain; Mohammed Abid Zahir Hussain
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-04-26

8.  Comparison of primary and secondary closure with a buccal mucosal-advancement flap on postoperative course after mandibular impacted third molar surgery.

Authors:  R Balamurugan; Thomas Zachariah
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-11-15

9.  Primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

Authors:  Kiran Khande; Harish Saluja; Uma Mahindra
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-04-22

10.  Comparison of corticosteroids and rubber drain for reduction of sequelae after third molar surgery.

Authors:  Mohammad Zandi
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.