Literature DB >> 9179173

Test of the health promotion model as a causal model of construction workers' use of hearing protection.

S L Lusk1, D L Ronis, M M Hogan.   

Abstract

The health promotion model (HPM) was tested as a causal model of construction workers' use of hearing protection (N = 359). Theoretical and exploratory models fit well, with the theoretical model accounting for 36.3% of variance and the exploratory model accounting for 50.6% of variance in hearing protection use. Value of use (benefits of using hearing protection), barriers to use, and self-efficacy were significant predictors in both the theoretical and exploratory models, but perceived health status was a predictor only in the theoretical model. In the exploratory model, where modifying factors were allowed direct relationships with use of hearing protection, two modifying factors--noise exposure and interpersonal influences-modeling--were significant predictors. Results of this test of the HPM are consistent with the revised HPM (Pender, 1996). There were significant direct paths from modifying factors to behaviour. Use of hearing protection was best predicted by behavior-specific predictors, such as perceived barriers to use of hearing protection. Results support the use of the HPM to predict use of hearing protection.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9179173     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199706)20:3<183::aid-nur2>3.0.co;2-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Nurs Health        ISSN: 0160-6891            Impact factor:   2.228


  14 in total

1.  Predictors of hearing protection behavior among firefighters in the United States.

Authors:  Oisaeng Hong; Dal Lae Chin; David L Ronis
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2013-03

2.  A multi-component intervention to promote hearing protector use among construction workers.

Authors:  Noah S Seixas; Rick Neitzel; Bert Stover; Lianne Sheppard; Bill Daniell; Jane Edelson; Hendrika Meischke
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Efficacy of a computer-based hearing test and tailored hearing protection intervention.

Authors:  OiSaeng Hong; David L Ronis; Sally L Lusk; Gwang-Soog Kee
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2006

4.  Noise exposure and hearing loss prevention programmes after 20 years of regulations in the United States.

Authors:  W E Daniell; S S Swan; M M McDaniel; J E Camp; M A Cohen; J G Stebbins
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Predictors of hearing protection use in construction workers.

Authors:  Jane Edelson; Richard Neitzel; Hendrika Meischke; William Daniell; Lianne Sheppard; Bert Stover; Noah Seixas
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2009-06-16

6.  Perceived health competence predicts health behavior and health-related quality of life in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Justin M Bachmann; Kathryn M Goggins; Samuel K Nwosu; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Sunil Kripalani; Kenneth A Wallston
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-07-15

7.  Knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and noise exposure of baristas.

Authors:  Alyssa J Pursley; Gabrielle H Saunders
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Effects of interventions on use of hearing protectors among farm operators: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marjorie C McCullagh; Tanima Banerjee; Michael A Cohen; James J Yang
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 2.117

9.  Protocol of a randomized controlled trial of hearing protection interventions for farm operators.

Authors:  Marjorie C McCullagh; David L Ronis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  Theory-based interventions in physical activity: a systematic review of literature in Iran.

Authors:  Jalal Abdi; Hassan Eftekhar; Fatemeh Estebsari; Roya Sadeghi
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2014-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.