Literature DB >> 9179149

Facts, fallacies, and fancies of nerve conduction studies: twenty-first annual Edward H. Lambert Lecture.

J Kimura1.   

Abstract

Optimal application of the nerve conduction study depends on an understanding of the principles and a recognition of the pitfalls of the technique. The conventional methods deal primarily with distal nerve segments in an extremity. Other techniques allow one to assess nerve segments in less accessible anatomical regions, to improve the accuracy in precisely localizing a focal lesion, and to increase sensitivity in detecting subclinical abnormalities. Despite certain limitations, these methods can provide diagnostically pertinent information if they are used judiciously in appropriate clinical contexts. I wish to review the fundamental concepts of nerve stimulation techniques and their proper applications in the clinical domain. The discussion primarily relates to the importance of reproducibility of various measures and pitfalls in the evaluation of conduction block.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9179149     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199707)20:7<777::aid-mus1>3.0.co;2-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  8 in total

1.  Segmental nerve conduction velocity in vibration-exposed shipyard workers.

Authors:  M Cherniack; A J Brammer; R Lundstrom; J Meyer; T F Morse; G Nealy; T Nilsson; D Peterson; E Toppilla; N Warren; R W Fu; H Bruneau
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2004-02-20       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 2.  Nerve conduction studies: essentials and pitfalls in practice.

Authors:  A Mallik; A I Weir
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Repeatability of nerve conduction measurements using automation.

Authors:  Xuan Kong; Eugene A Lesser; J Thomas Megerian; Shai N Gozani
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic ultrasound in the diagnosis of phrenic neuropathy.

Authors:  Andrea J Boon; Hiroshi Sekiguchi; Caitlin J Harper; Jeffrey A Strommen; Leili S Ghahfarokhi; James C Watson; Eric J Sorenson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Modeling and Reproducibility of Twin Concentric Electrical Impedance Myography.

Authors:  Marti Martinez de Morentin Cardoner; Hyeuknam Kwon; Hilda Victoria Gutierrez Pulido; Janice Nagy; Seward Rutkove; Benjamin Sanchez
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 4.756

6.  Test-retest reliability of transcarpal sensory NCV method for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Seyed Mostafa Jazayeri; Alireza Ashraf; Hajar Karimian; Ali Moghari; Asma Azadeh
Journal:  Ann Indian Acad Neurol       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.383

7.  Repeatability of nerve conduction measurements derived entirely by computer methods.

Authors:  Xuan Kong; Eugene A Lesser; Shai N Gozani
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Patient-Reported Disability Measures Do Not Correlate with Electrodiagnostic Severity in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Authors:  Jacob E Tulipan; Kevin F Lutsky; Mitchell G Maltenfort; Mitchell K Freedman; Pedro K Beredjiklian
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-08-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.