Literature DB >> 9177866

Osteocytes and bone lining cells: which are the best candidates for mechano-sensors in cancellous bone?

M G Mullender1, R Huiskes.   

Abstract

Previously, we have investigated the possible role of osteocytes as mechano-sensors, and mediators of bone turnover. It was found that the proposed regulatory mechanism produced morphologies of trabecular bone, under particular loading conditions, which were consistent with morphogenesis and adaptation as seen in reality. The main objective of this study was to discern whether lining cells or osteoblasts could possibly play a similar role as effectively with regard to their capacity for self-optimization of the trabecular architecture, in terms of a low apparent mass to stiffness ratio. For that purpose the earlier analyses with osteocytes as mechano-sensors, distributed throughout the bone, were repeated for mechano-sensors located at bone surfaces only. Compared to the osteocyte model, the surface cell remodeling algorithm was reluctant to change its architecture, which implies that it is less sensitive to changes in the loading pattern. This resulted in less efficient bone adaptation, which was reflected by a considerably higher relative mass for a similar apparent stiffness in the loading direction. In other words, more mass is needed to obtain an equally stiff structure, at the apparent level, with respect to the externally applied loads. Furthermore, stresses and strains at the tissue level vary across a much wider range, relative to the osteocyte model, where the higher incidence of elevated strains indicates an increased failure risk. Therefore, we conclude that mechanical information at the bone surface may not be sufficient to adequately regulate functional bone adaptation.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9177866     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(97)00036-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  21 in total

Review 1.  If bone is the answer, then what is the question?

Authors:  R Huiskes
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  The past, present, and future of bone morphometry: its contribution to an improved understanding of bone biology.

Authors:  Webster S S Jee
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Osteocyte lacunae tissue strain in cortical bone.

Authors:  Daniel P Nicolella; Donald E Moravits; Adrian M Gale; Lynda F Bonewald; James Lankford
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-07-01       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Microcracks in cortical bone: how do they affect bone biology?

Authors:  Fergal J O'Brien; Orlaith Brennan; Oran D Kennedy; T Clive Lee
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 5.  Roles of gap junctions and hemichannels in bone cell functions and in signal transmission of mechanical stress.

Authors:  Jean Xin Jiang; Arlene Janel Siller-Jackson; Sirisha Burra
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2007-01-01

6.  The role of osteocytes in bone mechanotransduction.

Authors:  A Santos; A D Bakker; J Klein-Nulend
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Potential role for a specialized β3 integrin-based structure on osteocyte processes in bone mechanosensation.

Authors:  Pamela Cabahug-Zuckerman; Randy F Stout; Robert J Majeska; Mia M Thi; David C Spray; Sheldon Weinbaum; Mitchell B Schaffler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Sustained swimming increases the mineral content and osteocyte density of salmon vertebral bone.

Authors:  Geir K Totland; Per Gunnar Fjelldal; Harald Kryvi; Guro Løkka; Anna Wargelius; Anita Sagstad; Tom Hansen; Sindre Grotmol
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Remodeling in bone without osteocytes: billfish challenge bone structure-function paradigms.

Authors:  Ayelet Atkins; Mason N Dean; Maria Laura Habegger; Phillip J Motta; Lior Ofer; Felix Repp; Anna Shipov; Steve Weiner; John D Currey; Ron Shahar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Nonproliferative and Proliferative Lesions of the Rat and Mouse Skeletal Tissues (Bones, Joints, and Teeth).

Authors:  Stacey Fossey; John Vahle; Philip Long; Scott Schelling; Heinrich Ernst; Rogely Waite Boyce; Jacquelin Jolette; Brad Bolon; Alison Bendele; Matthias Rinke; Laura Healy; Wanda High; Daniel Robert Roth; Michael Boyle; Joel Leininger
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 1.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.