Literature DB >> 9175451

Attentional selection and attentional gradients: an alternative method for studying transient visual-spatial attention.

M Eimer1.   

Abstract

In two experiments, I employed an alternative method for studying transient visual-spatial attention. Instead of using precues, attention was manipulated by presenting most stimuli sequentially at predictable locations. In Experiment 1, most stimuli appeared in a regular clockwise or counterclockwise order, but some were separated by one or both visual meridians from the expected location. In Experiment 2, most stimuli were presented successively along the horizontal meridian, and some stimuli were separated by one, two, or three positions from the expected location. Faster response times and larger posterior P1 and N1 components as well as enhanced negativities at midline electrodes were found for expected-location than for unexpected-location stimuli. These effects were partially modulated by the distance of unexpected stimuli from the current focus of attention, suggesting the existence of attentional gradients. Moreover, the data suggest that the direction of previous attentional shifts and the visual meridians play an important role for spatial attention.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9175451     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02407.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  7 in total

1.  Localizing cortical sources of event-related potentials in infants' covert orienting.

Authors:  John E Richards
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2005-05

2.  Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision.

Authors:  J-M Hopf; C N Boehler; S J Luck; J K Tsotsos; H-J Heinze; M A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; E K Vogel; S J Luck
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Testing neural models of the development of infant visual attention.

Authors:  John E Richards; Sharon K Hunter
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.038

5.  Rapid feature-driven changes in the attentional window.

Authors:  Carly J Leonard; Javier Lopez-Calderon; Johanna Kreither; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 6.  Cortical source localization of infant cognition.

Authors:  Greg D Reynolds; John E Richards
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.253

7.  The Graded Fate of Unattended Stimulus Representations in Visuospatial Working Memory.

Authors:  Muhammet I Sahan; Edwin S Dalmaijer; Tom Verguts; Masud Husain; Wim Fias
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.