Literature DB >> 9175213

Quality of life measurement after rectal excision for cancer. Comparison between straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis.

O Hallböök1, U Hass, A Wänström, R Sjödahl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The patients in this study formed part of a multicentre randomized trial comparing the straight and colonic pouch anastomoses after rectal excision for cancer. The trial reflected an advantage of the pouch group regarding frequency, urgency and incontinence. We hypothesized that such differences in bowel function would be reflected in a general quality of life score.
METHODS: Forty-five patients were randomized. The Nottingham Health Profile was used to measure health-related quality of life before and 1 year after surgery.
RESULTS: There was no difference in quality of life score when the two groups were compared. When calculating the relative change after surgery, there was an improvement in both groups regarding the total score of the Profile (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The Nottingham Health Profile was effective in showing an improvement in quality of life in both groups after surgery. The observed difference in clinical bowel function was not, however, reflected in an improved quality of life score as measured by the Profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9175213     DOI: 10.3109/00365529709025087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  11 in total

1.  [Reconstructive surgery after anterior resection of the rectum].

Authors:  S Willis; V Schumpelick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Quality of life assessment in surgical oncology trials.

Authors:  Kerry Avery; Jane M Blazeby
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Prospective randomised trial comparing ileocaecal interposition and colon-J-pouch as rectal replacement after total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  A D Rink; F Haaf; N Knupper; K-H Vestweber
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Coloanal anastomosis or abdominoperineal resection for very low rectal cancer: what will benefit, the surgeon's pride or the patient's quality of life?

Authors:  Rosa Digennaro; Mirna Tondo; Filippa Cuccia; Ivana Giannini; Francesco Pezzolla; Marcella Rinaldi; Dario Scala; Giovanni Romano; Donato F Altomare
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-12-30       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  Quality of life measurement in gastrointestinal and liver disorders.

Authors:  M R Borgaonkar; E J Irvine
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  M M Grumann; E M Noack; I A Hoffmann; P M Schlag
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  Jutta Engel; Jacqueline Kerr; Anne Schlesinger-Raab; Renate Eckel; Hansjörg Sauer; Dieter Hölzel
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Survival after surgical treatment of cancer of the rectum.

Authors:  W Hohenberger; B Bittorf; T Papadopoulos; S Merkel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 9.  Reconstructive techniques after rectal resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  C J Brown; D S Fenech; R S McLeod
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16

10.  Comparison of Colonic J-pouch and Straight Coloanal anastomosis after Low Anterior Resection.

Authors:  Shaban Mehrvarz; Seyed Mohsen Towliat; Hassan Ali Mohebbi; Saieed Derakhshani; Mahdi Abavisani
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 0.611

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.