Literature DB >> 9174429

The incidence of ectopic pregnancy in Hordaland County, Norway 1976-1993.

O Storeide1, M Veholmen, M Eide, P Bergsjø, R Sandvei.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To gain longterm knowledge of incidence rates of ectopic pregnancy, as a basis for analysing risk factors. MATERIAL: The incidence of ectopic pregnancy was studied in the county of Hordaland, Western Norway, through 18 years, 1976-1993. The protocols of 1821 cases of ectopic pregnancy were registered. Population data of the county, the number of births and legal abortions were available.
RESULTS: There was considerable increase in crude numbers of ectopic pregnancies throughout the period. Grouping the cases in three six-year periods showed an increased crude incidence rate per 100,000 women from 95 during 1976-81 to 154 during 1988-93. The corresponding rates per 1000 births increased from 13.6 to 22.2 and the rates per 1000 reported pregnancies from 11.2 to 18.0. All rates increased also in women aged 40-44 years. During the years 1979-1993 the rates per 1000 reported pregnancies increased by 25%, from 9.4 to 11.8 in age groups below 30 years, while the rates for women over 35 years increased by 98%, from 20.7 to 40.9. Compared to the age group 15-19, women over 35 years had an eightfold risk during the last period. In addition they also contributed to higher numbers of reported pregnancies by 58%.
CONCLUSION: The rates of ectopic pregnancy increased in age groups older than 20 years during 1976-93, moderately in younger age groups, but considerably in older age groups, who also contributed with higher total rates of pregnancy. More older women, with presumably accumulated risk factors getting pregnant, thus explain part of the increased rates of this disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9174429     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.1997.tb07990.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  9 in total

Review 1.  Ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  J I Tay; J Moore; J J Walker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-01

Review 2.  Ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  J I Tay; J Moore; J J Walker
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-08

3.  Surveillance in a time of changing health care practices: estimating ectopic pregnancy incidence in the United States.

Authors:  Suzanne B Zane; Burney A Kieke; Juliette S Kendrick; Carol Bruce
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2002-12

4.  Human Chorionic Gonadotropine in Cul-de-sac Fluid in Tubal Ectopic Pregnacy; A New Diagnostic Approach.

Authors:  Ayse Karahasanoglu; Isil Uzun; Mucize Ozdemir; Fehmi Yazicioglu
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-04-01

5.  Clinical effectiveness of urinary human chorionic gonadotropin related protein (hCGRP) quantification for diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Jae-Kwan Lee; Min-Jeong Oh; Joong-Sik Shin; Kyung-Joo Lee; Jung-Hyun Nam; Jung-Hak Cha; Jin-Dong Chang; Dong-Hee Cho; In-Soo Kang; Paul I Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Recurrent ectopic pregnancy in the tubal remnant after salpingectomy.

Authors:  Bahareh Samiei-Sarir; Christopher Diehm
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-09-18

7.  Abdominal pregnancy as a cause of hemoperitoneum.

Authors:  Sheikh Muzamil Shafi; Misbha Afsheen Malla; Parvaiz Ahmed Salaam; Omer Shareef Kirmani
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2009-09

8.  Laparoscopic management of tubal ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Dah-Ching Ding; Tang-Yuan Chu; Sheng-Po Kao; Pao-Chu Chen; Yu-Chi Wei
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  The METEX study: methotrexate versus expectant management in women with ectopic pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Norah M van Mello; Femke Mol; Albert H Adriaanse; Erik A Boss; Antonius B Dijkman; Johannes Pr Doornbos; Mark Hans Emanuel; Jaap Friederich; Loes van der Leeuw-Harmsen; Jos P Lips; Evert Jp van Santbrink; Harold R Verhoeve; Harry Visser; Willem M Ankum; Fulco van der Veen; Ben W Mol; Petra J Hajenius
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 2.809

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.