Literature DB >> 9174309

The effect of skull-pin insertion on cerebrospinal fluid pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure: influence of sufentanil and fentanyl.

S Jamali1, D Archer, P Ravussin, M Bonnafous, P David, C Ecoffey.   

Abstract

This randomized prospective study measured the effects of an intravenous opioid bolus on cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) during skull-pin insertion. Twenty-two adult patients scheduled for elective craniotomy for supratentorial lesions were studied. Outcome variables were MAP, heart rate (HR), and lumbar CSFP. The standardized anesthetic regimen included fentanyl (2 microg/kg), thiopental (5-7 mg/kg), lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg), isoflurane (0.3-0.7 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration), and vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg). During stable anesthesia, sufentanil (0.8 microg/kg) or fentanyl (4.5 microg/kg) was given as a bolus before skull-pin insertion. The hemodynamic effects of the opioid injection were modified with phenylephrine and/or atropine when indicated. CSFP remained unchanged in both treatment groups. MAP and CPP increased approximately 10 mm Hg after skull-pin insertion (P<0.001). In the sufentanil group, HR decreased approximately 10 bpm after opioid injection and remained decreased throughout the study. In fentanyl-treated patients, HR decreased 8 bpm after opioid injection but returned to preopioid rates after skull-pin insertion. In conclusion, in anesthetized patients, an intravenous bolus of fentanyl or sufentanil prior to skull-pin insertion results in stable values of CSFP, CPP, BP, and HR when the hemodynamic effects of the opioid are modified with phenylephrine and atropine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9174309     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199706000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  6 in total

1.  Efficacy of fentanyl and/or lidocaine on total antioxidants and total oxidants during craniotomy.

Authors:  Ayse Mizrak; Ibrahim Erkutlu; Mehmet Alptekin; Elzem Sen; Murat Geyik; Abdulvahab Gok; Unsal Oner
Journal:  Clin Med Res       Date:  2011-01-24

2.  Dexmedetomidine in the supratentorial craniotomy.

Authors:  Osman Ilhan; Senem Koruk; Gokcen Serin; Ibrahim Erkutlu; Unsal Oner
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2010-08

3.  How effective is the local anesthetic infiltration of pin sites prior to application of head clamps: A prospective observational cohort study of hemodynamic response in patients undergoing elective craniotomy.

Authors:  Ayesha Arshad; Muhammad Shahzad Shamim; Muhammad Waqas; Hina Enam; Syed Ather Enam
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2013-07-18

4.  [Should we continue to infiltrate the scalp with a local anesthetic for a craniotomy?].

Authors:  Mouhssine Doumiri; Youssef Motiaa; Rachid Razine; Morad Amor; Abdelmajid Moussaoui; Saad Kabbaj; Wajdi Maazouzi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2015-09-03

5.  Low Dose Dexmedetomidine Attenuates Hemodynamic Response to Skull Pin Holder Application.

Authors:  Shwethashri Ramaprasannakumar Kondavagilu; Vinayak Seenappa Pujari; Mohan V R Chadalawada; Yatish Bevinguddaiah
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

6.  Comparison of intravenous labetalol and bupivacaine scalp block on the hemodynamic and entropy changes following skull pin application: A randomized, open label clinical trial.

Authors:  Sidhesh Bharne; Prasanna Udupi Bidkar; Ashok Shankar Badhe; Satyen Parida; Andi Sadayandi Ramesh
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.