Literature DB >> 9170488

Premature rupture of membranes at term: a meta-analysis of three management schemes.

E L Mozurkewich1, F M Wolf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of cesarean birth, endometritis, chorioamnionitis, and serious neonatal infections among pregnancies complicated by premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at term and managed by immediate oxytocin induction, by conservative management (or delayed oxytocin induction), or by vaginal (or endocervical) prostaglandin E2, gel, suppositories, or tablets. DATA SOURCES: The English-language literature in MLD, LINE and other databases was searched through April 1996 using the terms "fetal membranes," "premature rupture," and "term." METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized trials comparing two or more management schemes for PROM at term. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND
RESULTS: Twenty-three studies with a total of 7493 subjects met the inclusion criteria and were included for analysis. Data regarding chorioamnionitis, endometritis, neonatal infections, and cesarean delivery were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed for the three interventions for these outcomes of interest using the Der-Simonian and Laird and Mantel-Haenszel techniques to estimate the pooled odds ratios (ORs). No statistically significant differences in cesarean deliveries or neonatal infections were noted among management schemes. Vaginal prostaglandins resulted in more chorioamnionitis than immediate oxytocin (OR 1.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09, 2.21), but less chorioamnionitis than conservative management (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51, 0.91). Immediate oxytocin induction resulted in fewer cases of chorioamnionitis (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.52, 0.85) and endometritis (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51, 0.99) than conservative management, although these results achieved significance only with the Mantel-Haenszel technique.
CONCLUSION: Conservative management may result in more maternal infections than immediate induction with oxytocin or prostaglandins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9170488     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00094-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  4 in total

1.  Answering clinical questions: What is the best way to search the Web?

Authors:  Miriam Lacasse; Valérie Lafortune; Lynsey Bartlett; Jessica Guimond
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Premature rupture of membranes at term: a medical and economic rationale for active management.

Authors:  P Duff
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more).

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Vicki Flenady; Rosemary D McBain; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-01-04

4.  [Prelabour rupture of membranes (PROM) at term: prognostic factors and neonatal consequences].

Authors:  Asmama Yasmina; Amina Barakat
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2017-02-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.