Literature DB >> 9169847

Switching the in vivo specificity of a minimal Hox-responsive element.

S K Chan1, H D Ryoo, A Gould, R Krumlauf, R S Mann.   

Abstract

The homeodomain proteins encoded by the Hox complex genes do not bind DNA with high specificity. In vitro, Hox specificity can be increased by binding to DNA cooperatively with the homeodomain protein extradenticle or its vertebrate homologs, the pbx proteins (together, the PBC family). Here we show that a two basepair change in a Hox-PBC binding site switches the Hox-dependent expression pattern generated in vivo, from labial to Deformed. The change in vivo correlates with an altered Hox binding specificity in vitro. Further, we identify similar Deformed-PBC binding sites in the Deformed and Hoxb-4 genes and show that they generate Deformed or Hoxb-4 expression patterns in Drosophila and mouse embryos, respectively. These results suggest a model in which Hox-PBC binding sites play an instructive role in Hox specificity by promoting the formation of different Hox-PBC heterodimers in vivo. Thus, the choice of Hox partner, and therefore Hox target genes, depends on subtle differences between Hox-PBC binding sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9169847     DOI: 10.1242/dev.124.10.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Development        ISSN: 0950-1991            Impact factor:   6.868


  30 in total

1.  PBX and MEIS as non-DNA-binding partners in trimeric complexes with HOX proteins.

Authors:  K Shanmugam; N C Green; I Rambaldi; H U Saragovi; M S Featherstone
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Regulation by homeoproteins: a comparison of deformed-responsive elements.

Authors:  J A Pederson; J W LaFollette; C Gross; A Veraksa; W McGinnis; J W Mahaffey
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  A green fluorescent protein reporter genetic screen that identifies modifiers of Hox gene function in the Drosophila embryo.

Authors:  Samir Merabet; Francoise Catala; Jacques Pradel; Yacine Graba
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A genetic screen of the Drosophila X chromosome for mutations that modify Deformed function.

Authors:  B Florence; W McGinnis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Hox proteins coordinate peripodial decapentaplegic expression to direct adult head morphogenesis in Drosophila.

Authors:  Brian G Stultz; Sung Yeon Park; Mark A Mortin; James A Kennison; Deborah A Hursh
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 3.582

6.  Segment-specific regulation of the Drosophila AP-2 gene during leg and antennal development.

Authors:  Youngwook Ahn; Jizhong Zou; Pamela J Mitchell
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2011-05-07       Impact factor: 3.582

7.  The control of trunk Hox specificity and activity by Extradenticle.

Authors:  H D Ryoo; R S Mann
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

8.  Disparate expression specificities coded by a shared Hox-C enhancer.

Authors:  Steve W Miller; James W Posakony
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  DUX4, a candidate gene of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, encodes a transcriptional activator of PITX1.

Authors:  Manjusha Dixit; Eugénie Ansseau; Alexandra Tassin; Sara Winokur; Rongye Shi; Hong Qian; Sébastien Sauvage; Christel Mattéotti; Anne M van Acker; Oberdan Leo; Denise Figlewicz; Marietta Barro; Dalila Laoudj-Chenivesse; Alexandra Belayew; Frédérique Coppée; Yi-Wen Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Hox genes and their candidate downstream targets in the developing central nervous system.

Authors:  Z N Akin; A J Nazarali
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.046

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.