Literature DB >> 9169549

Intron distribution in ancient paralogs supports random insertion and not random loss.

G Cho1, R F Doolittle.   

Abstract

The intron positions of ten different protein families were examined to determine (the statistical likelihood of) whether spliceosomal introns are the result of random insertion events into previously intronless genes, on the one hand, or the result of random loss from common ancestral introns, on the other. The number of expected matches for the alternative scenarios was calculated for a binomial distribution by considering currently observed introns relative to all possible locations for insertion or loss. Introns occurring at approximately the same location (hereafter called a "match") were tallied for each of the paired proteins. Matches were identified by their positions in the multiple alignment and were defined as any two introns occurring within a window of 11 possible nucleotide positions, thereby allowing for possible alignment errors and "intron sliding." Matches were tallied from the raw data and compared with the expected number of matches for the two different scenarios. The results suggest that the distribution of introns in genes encoding proteins is due to random insertion and not random loss.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9169549     DOI: 10.1007/pl00006180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  24 in total

1.  EID: the Exon-Intron Database-an exhaustive database of protein-coding intron-containing genes.

Authors:  S Saxonov; I Daizadeh; A Fedorov; W Gilbert
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Late changes in spliceosomal introns define clades in vertebrate evolution.

Authors:  B Venkatesh; Y Ning; S Brenner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Non-coding RNAs: the architects of eukaryotic complexity.

Authors:  J S Mattick
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Intron distribution difference for 276 ancient and 131 modern genes suggests the existence of ancient introns.

Authors:  A Fedorov; X Cao; S Saxonov; S J de Souza; S W Roy; W Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolutionary relationships among Rel domains indicate functional diversification by recombination.

Authors:  I A Graef; J M Gastier; U Francke; G R Crabtree
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Prevalence of intron gain over intron loss in the evolution of paralogous gene families.

Authors:  Vladimir N Babenko; Igor B Rogozin; Sergei L Mekhedov; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Evolutionary dynamics of spliceosomal intron revealed by in silico analyses of the P-Type ATPase superfamily genes.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Oda; Ryosuke L Ohniwa; Yuki Suzuki; Masatsugu Denawa; Masahiro Kumeta; Hideyuki Okamura; Kunio Takeyasu
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  Phylogenetic and exon-intron structure analysis of fungal subtilisins: support for a mixed model of intron evolution.

Authors:  Chengshu Wang; Milton A Typas; Tariq M Butt
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  Complex early genes.

Authors:  Scott W Roy; Walter Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Rates of intron loss and gain: implications for early eukaryotic evolution.

Authors:  Scott William Roy; Walter Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.