Literature DB >> 9167821

Accuracy of imaging the menisci on an in-office, dedicated, magnetic resonance imaging extremity system.

P D Franklin1, R A Lemon, H S Barden.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging effectively defines and characterizes musculoskeletal pathologic lesions, particularly meniscal tears. Most studies comparing the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic evaluation have been performed on high-field (1.5-T) systems. The effectiveness of a low-field (0.2-T), dedicated, extremity magnetic resonance imaging device in diagnosing meniscal tears was studied prospectively on 35 patients with knee symptoms who subsequently had arthroscopic evaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging examinations were performed before surgery and were read by an experienced radiologist who was blinded to the results of the arthroscopic evaluations. Specificity was 100% for both the medial and lateral menisci. Sensitivity was 86% for the medial menisci, 89% for the lateral menisci, and 87% for both. Accuracy was 91% for the medial menisci, 97% for the lateral menisci, and 94% overall. The positive predictive values were 100% for the medial menisci, 100% for the lateral menisci, and 100% for both. The negative predictive values were 81% for the medial menisci, 96% for the lateral menisci, and 91% for both. The low-field magnetic resonance imaging system provided specificity and sensitivity that were equal to or better than previous reports with high-field systems. In particular, this low-field system eliminated the problem of false-positive results that has been found in some studies using high-field systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9167821     DOI: 10.1177/036354659702500319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  6 in total

1.  Estimating Motion From MRI Data.

Authors:  Cengizhan Ozturk; J Andrew Derbyshire; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 10.961

Review 2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for suspected ACL and meniscal tears of the knee.

Authors:  Nigel Phelan; Patrick Rowland; Rose Galvin; John M O'Byrne
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Kinematic magnetic resonance imaging of the effect of bracing on patellar position: qualitative assessment using an extremity magnetic resonance system.

Authors:  F G Shellock; M Mullin; K R Stone; M Coleman; J V Crues
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Role of low field MRI in detecting knee lesions.

Authors:  Massimiliano Leigheb; Giuseppe Guzzardi; Michela Barini; Michele Abruzzese; Silvia Riva; Alessio Paschè; Francesco Pogliacomi; Lia Rimondini; Alessandro Stecco; Federico Alberto Grassi; Alessandro Carriero
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2018-12-10

5.  A flexible MRI coil based on a cable conductor and applied to knee imaging.

Authors:  Bili Wang; Syed S Siddiq; Jerzy Walczyk; Mary Bruno; Iman Khodarahmi; Inge M Brinkmann; Robert Rehner; Karthik Lakshmanan; Jan Fritz; Ryan Brown
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Analysis of Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners for Evaluation of Knee Pathology Based on Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Christopher S Lee; Shane M Davis; Claire McGroder; William B Stetson; Scott E Powell
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2013-12-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.