Literature DB >> 9165388

A uniform strain criterion for trabecular bone adaptation: do continuum-level strain gradients drive adaptation?

C H Turner1, V Anne, R M Pidaparti.   

Abstract

In this paper, it is postulated that the apparent density of trabecular bone adapts so that continuum-level strains within the bone are uniform and, as a consequence, spatial strain gradients within the bone/marrow continuum are minimized. The feasibility of a uniform strain criterion was tested using computational finite-element analysis of the proximal femur. We demonstrated that (1) this criterion produced a realistic apparent density distribution in the proximal femur, (2) the solutions for apparent density were convergent and unique, (3) predicted apparent densities compared well to experimental measurements, and (4) strain gradients within the bone/marrow continuum were reduced substantially. Thus, a possible goal of trabecular bone adaptation may be the reduction of strain gradients within the bone/marrow continuum. Osteocytes within the bone tissue and bone cells on the surface of a trabeculum are mechanosensitive and play a role in bone adaptation. In addition, the bone marrow is rich in osteoprogenitor cells near the bone surface that are mechanosensitive. Strain gradients within bone/marrow continuum cause pressure gradients in the marrow, causing extracellular fluid flow which could stimulate osteoprogenitor cells and contribute to bone adaptation.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9165388     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(97)84505-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  13 in total

1.  Simulation of orthodontic tooth movements. A comparison of numerical models.

Authors:  C Bourauel; D Freudenreich; D Vollmer; D Kobe; D Drescher; A Jäger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Cancellous bone and theropod dinosaur locomotion. Part I-an examination of cancellous bone architecture in the hindlimb bones of theropods.

Authors:  Peter J Bishop; Scott A Hocknull; Christofer J Clemente; John R Hutchinson; Andrew A Farke; Belinda R Beck; Rod S Barrett; David G Lloyd
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  The healing stages of an intramedullary implanted tibia: A stress strain comparative analysis of the calcification process.

Authors:  Vincenzo Filardi
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-01-31

4.  Personalised high tibial osteotomy has mechanical safety equivalent to generic device in a case-control in silico clinical trial.

Authors:  Alisdair R MacLeod; Nicholas Peckham; Gil Serrancolí; Ines Rombach; Patrick Hourigan; Vipul I Mandalia; Andrew D Toms; Benjamin J Fregly; Harinderjit S Gill
Journal:  Commun Med (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-30

5.  Finite element analysis of bone remodelling with piezoelectric effects using an open-source framework.

Authors:  Yogesh Deepak Bansod; Maeruan Kebbach; Daniel Kluess; Rainer Bader; Ursula van Rienen
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2021-03-19

6.  Compression or tension? The stress distribution in the proximal femur.

Authors:  K E Rudman; R M Aspden; J R Meakin
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Volume-based non-continuum modeling of bone functional adaptation.

Authors:  Zhengyuan Wang; Adrian Mondry
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 2.432

8.  A comparative study of orthotropic and isotropic bone adaptation in the femur.

Authors:  Diogo M Geraldes; Andrew T M Phillips
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 2.747

9.  Validation of Material Algorithms for Femur Remodelling Using Medical Image Data.

Authors:  Shitong Luo; Xingquan Shen; Xin Bai; Jing Bai; Jianning Han; Yu Shang
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 1.781

Review 10.  Mechanical basis of bone strength: influence of bone material, bone structure and muscle action.

Authors:  N H Hart; S Nimphius; T Rantalainen; A Ireland; A Siafarikas; R U Newton
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.041

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.