PURPOSE: We studied the natural history of postoperative enhancement on magnetic resonance (MR) scans in patients with malignant glioma to determine the following: (1) when a postoperative MR scan most accurately shows residual enhancing tumor; and (2) whether repeated doses of the contrast agent gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) were well tolerated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients with malignant glioma underwent tumor resection; four (24%) had nonenhancing tumors preoperatively. Serial MR scans were performed on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 21 and were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The evolution of enhancement and subacute hemorrhage were described and measured. A uniform schedule of postoperative dexamethasone administration was used in all but four patients (24%) (each required higher doses to maintain neurologic function). RESULTS: Nontumoral, marginal (i.e., postsurgical) enhancement, potentially mimicking residual tumor, developed in eight patients (53%), including tumors that were nonenhancing preoperatively, and was maximal from days 5 to 14. Tumor enhancement was optimally visualized on postoperative days 3 to 5. Nine of 10 patients (90%) with gross residual enhancing tumor showed an increase of enhancing tumor size during the study. Methemoglobin was detected at some time in all patients (100%) and was usually minor, but in six (35%) it interfered with residual tumor assessment. The 97 doses of Gd-DTPA, administered in 17 patients, were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: When accurate assessment of residual enhancing tumor is needed in patients with malignant glioma, an MR scan performed on postoperative days 3 to 5 should minimize the confounding effects of postsurgical enhancement and methemoglobin. The repeated administration of Gd-DTPA over several weeks is well tolerated.
PURPOSE: We studied the natural history of postoperative enhancement on magnetic resonance (MR) scans in patients with malignant glioma to determine the following: (1) when a postoperative MR scan most accurately shows residual enhancing tumor; and (2) whether repeated doses of the contrast agent gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) were well tolerated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventeen patients with malignant glioma underwent tumor resection; four (24%) had nonenhancing tumors preoperatively. Serial MR scans were performed on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 21 and were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The evolution of enhancement and subacute hemorrhage were described and measured. A uniform schedule of postoperative dexamethasone administration was used in all but four patients (24%) (each required higher doses to maintain neurologic function). RESULTS: Nontumoral, marginal (i.e., postsurgical) enhancement, potentially mimicking residual tumor, developed in eight patients (53%), including tumors that were nonenhancing preoperatively, and was maximal from days 5 to 14. Tumor enhancement was optimally visualized on postoperative days 3 to 5. Nine of 10 patients (90%) with gross residual enhancing tumor showed an increase of enhancing tumor size during the study. Methemoglobin was detected at some time in all patients (100%) and was usually minor, but in six (35%) it interfered with residual tumor assessment. The 97 doses of Gd-DTPA, administered in 17 patients, were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: When accurate assessment of residual enhancing tumor is needed in patients with malignant glioma, an MR scan performed on postoperative days 3 to 5 should minimize the confounding effects of postsurgical enhancement and methemoglobin. The repeated administration of Gd-DTPA over several weeks is well tolerated.
Authors: Shivaram Avula; Andrew Peet; Giovanni Morana; Paul Morgan; Monika Warmuth-Metz; Tim Jaspan Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 1.475
Authors: Rebecca A Packer; John H Rossmeisl; Michael S Kent; John F Griffin; Christina Mazcko; Amy K LeBlanc Journal: Vet Radiol Ultrasound Date: 2018-03-09 Impact factor: 1.363
Authors: Nityanand Miskin; Prashin Unadkat; Michael E Carlton; Alexandra J Golby; Geoffrey S Young; Raymond Y Huang Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Maaike J Vos; Johannes Berkhof; Tjeerd J Postma; Otto S Hoekstra; Frederik Barkhof; Jan J Heimans Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2005-09-29 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: John H Rossmeisl; Paulo A Garcia; Gregory B Daniel; John Daniel Bourland; Waldemar Debinski; Nikolaos Dervisis; Shawna Klahn Journal: Vet Radiol Ultrasound Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 1.363
Authors: John H Suh; Rupesh Kotecha; Samuel T Chao; Manmeet S Ahluwalia; Arjun Sahgal; Eric L Chang Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Colin E Champ; Joshua Siglin; Mark V Mishra; Xinglei Shen; Maria Werner-Wasik; David W Andrews; Sonal U Mayekar; Haisong Liu; Wenyin Shi Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 3.481