Literature DB >> 9164202

bcl-2, p53, and response to tamoxifen in estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

R M Elledge1, S Green, L Howes, G M Clark, M Berardo, D C Allred, R Pugh, D Ciocca, P Ravdin, J O'Sullivan, S Rivkin, S Martino, C K Osborne.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that high bcl-2 expression and accumulation of p53 protein, both of which should inhibit apoptosis, are associated with a poorer tamoxifen response and a more aggressive clinical course in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancer.
METHODS: A total of 205 paraffin-embedded tumor blocks were evaluated for nuclear p53 (a marker of p53 inactivation) and cytoplasmic bcl-2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC). All patients received tamoxifen as initial therapy for metastatic disease. The study began in 1982 and follow-up duration of the 24 patients last known alive is 8 years.
RESULTS: Response to tamoxifen and time to treatment failure (TTF) were not significantly associated with p53 status, although patients with higher p53 had a worse survival (P = .008; median, 36 v 20 months). Higher bcl-2 expression was associated with higher levels of ER (P = .02), better response to tamoxifen (62% v 49%; P = .07), longer TTF (median, 9 v 5 months; P = .002), and better survival (median, 40 months v 25 months; P = .009). In multivariate analyses, including ER, progesterone receptor (PgR), and p53, high bcl-2 remained significantly associated with a longer TTF (P = .007) and survival (P = .07). p53 status was a significant factor for shorter survival (P = .05), but not for TTF (P = .61).
CONCLUSION: p53 status, as determined by IHC is not significantly associated with response to tamoxifen, although tumors with altered p53 protein are inherently more aggressive. Contrary to expectation, high bcl-2 identifies a relatively indolent phenotype of ER-positive metastatic breast cancer, in which patients experience a better clinical response to tamoxifen and a longer survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9164202     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.5.1916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  33 in total

Review 1.  Targeting BCL-2 to enhance vulnerability to therapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  D Merino; S W Lok; J E Visvader; G J Lindeman
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Bcl-2 expression and triple negative profile in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Imen Kallel-Bayoudh; Hanen Ben Hassen; Abdelmajid Khabir; Noureddine Boujelbene; Jamel Daoud; Mounir Frikha; Tahia Sallemi-Boudawara; Sami Aifa; Ahmed Rebaï
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Prognostic value of Bcl-2 in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Laura M Vargas-Roig; F Darío Cuello-Carrión; Nicolás Fernández-Escobar; Pedro Daguerre; Marcela Leuzzi; Jorge Ibarra; Francisco E Gago; Silvina B Nadin; Daniel R Ciocca
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2008-01-13       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 4.  Prognosis and prediction of response in breast cancer: the current role of the main biological markers.

Authors:  A Ravaioli; L Bagli; A Zucchini; F Monti
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  1998 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 6.831

5.  Bcl-2 antigen expression in luminal A and triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Carla Solange Escórcio-Dourado; Luana Mota Martins; Camila Maria Simplício-Revoredo; Fabiane Araújo Sampaio; Cléciton Braga Tavares; João Paulo da Silva-Sampaio; Umbelina Soares Borges; Francisco Adelton Alves-Ribeiro; Pedro Vitor Lopes-Costa; José Charles Lima-Dourado; Benedito Borges da Silva
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Low cleaved caspase-7 levels indicate unfavourable outcome across all breast cancers.

Authors:  Andreas U Lindner; Federico Lucantoni; Damir Varešlija; Alexa Resler; Brona M Murphy; William M Gallagher; Arnold D K Hill; Leonie S Young; Jochen H M Prehn
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 7.  Extranuclear signaling by sex steroid receptors and clinical implications in breast cancer.

Authors:  Viroj Boonyaratanakornkit; Nalo Hamilton; Diana C Márquez-Garbán; Prangwan Pateetin; Eileen M McGowan; Richard J Pietras
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.102

Review 8.  TP53 Mutations and Outcomes in Breast Cancer: Reading beyond the Headlines.

Authors:  Ashkan Shahbandi; Hoang D Nguyen; James G Jackson
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2020-02-05

Review 9.  The oestrogen-dependent biology of breast cancer. Sensitivity and resistance to aromatase inhibitors revisited: a molecular perspective.

Authors:  A Urruticoechea
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  A candidate molecular signature associated with tamoxifen failure in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Julie A Vendrell; Katherine E Robertson; Patrice Ravel; Susan E Bray; Agathe Bajard; Colin A Purdie; Catherine Nguyen; Sirwan M Hadad; Ivan Bieche; Sylvie Chabaud; Thomas Bachelot; Alastair M Thompson; Pascale A Cohen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.