Literature DB >> 9164180

Stanford-Kaiser Permanente G1 study for clinical stage I to IIA Hodgkin's disease: subtotal lymphoid irradiation versus vinblastine, methotrexate, and bleomycin chemotherapy and regional irradiation.

S J Horning1, R T Hoppe, J Mason, B W Brown, S L Hancock, D Baer, S A Rosenberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We have demonstrated that a relatively mild chemotherapy regimen, vinblastine, methotrexate, and bleomycin (VBM), and involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) could substitute for extended-field radiotherapy in patients with favorable Hodgkin's disease (HD) who have been laparotomy-staged. The purpose of this study is to determine if VBM and regional radiotherapy can substitute for extended-field radiotherapy in favorable clinical stage (CS) I and II HD. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with favorable CS I to II HD were randomly assigned to subtotal lymphoid irradiation (STLI) or VBM chemotherapy and regional radiotherapy. Randomization was stratified on the basis of age, sex, number of Ann Arbor sites, histology, and institution. Patients were evaluated for freedom from progressive HD, survival, and toxicity. Results were compared with the predecessor trial in pathologically staged patients.
RESULTS: With a median follow-up period of 4 years, the rate of freedom from progressive HD was 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88% to 96%) for patients treated with STLI and 87% (95% CI, 81% to 93%) for patients treated with VBM and regional radiotherapy. Six of seven patients who relapsed are alive and in remission following successful second-line therapy.
CONCLUSION: Given the caveat of a small number of patients, the results of extended-field radiotherapy and VBM and regional radiotherapy are comparable with a median follow-up period of 4 years. VBM serves as a paradigm to reduce late effects in favorable early-stage HD. We do not advocate its routine use in clinical practice, but instead encourage participation in clinical trials with the objective of maintaining efficacy while reducing toxicity in CS I and II HD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9164180     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.5.1736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  8 in total

Review 1.  Current therapies in Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  K E Kogel; J W Sweetenham
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  [Regional radiotherapy with chemotherapy (VMB) compared to subtotal-nodal irradiation. A Stanford study].

Authors:  M Busch; E Dühmke
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Risk of therapy-related secondary leukemia in Hodgkin lymphoma: the Stanford University experience over three generations of clinical trials.

Authors:  Michael Zach Koontz; Sandra J Horning; Raymond Balise; Peter L Greenberg; Saul A Rosenberg; Richard T Hoppe; Ranjana H Advani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Current concepts and controversies in the management of early stage Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Lauren S Maeda; Mark Lee; Ranjana H Advani
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2011-04-04

Review 5.  Chemotherapy, radiotherapy and combined modality for Hodgkin's disease, with emphasis on second cancer risk.

Authors:  J G Franklin; M D Paus; A Pluetschow; L Specht
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-10-19

6.  Efficacy of abbreviated Stanford V chemotherapy and involved-field radiotherapy in early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma: mature results of the G4 trial.

Authors:  R H Advani; R T Hoppe; D Baer; J Mason; R Warnke; J Allen; S Daadi; S A Rosenberg; S J Horning
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Current treatment strategies in early stage Hodgkin's disease.

Authors:  Andreas Josting; Volker Diehl
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2003-08

Review 8.  Managing lymphoma with non-FDG radiotracers: current clinical and preclinical applications.

Authors:  Fan-Lin Kong; Richard J Ford; David J Yang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.