Literature DB >> 9163619

Colony counting is a major source of variation in CFU-GM results between centres.

M A Lumley1, R Burgess, L J Billingham, D F McDonald, D W Milligan.   

Abstract

The results for colony forming unit granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) assays vary substantially between centres. It is possible that colony counting is largely responsible for this discrepancy. In order to examine this exclusively from the many factors that make up the CFU-GM assay, we performed a colony counting exercise involving 11 laboratories. Two-way analysis of variance showed a highly significant difference (P = 0.0001) in the counts obtained from the centres. One centre was found to score consistently high and two others scored consistently low numbers of colonies. This suggests that identification of colonies is a major source of variation between centres.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9163619     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.492695.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Haematol        ISSN: 0007-1048            Impact factor:   6.998


  3 in total

1.  The Cord Blood Apgar: a novel scoring system to optimize selection of banked cord blood grafts for transplantation (CME).

Authors:  Kristin M Page; Lijun Zhang; Adam Mendizabal; Stephen Wease; Shelly Carter; Kevin Shoulars; Tracy Gentry; Andrew E Balber; Joanne Kurtzberg
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 3.157

2.  Low-cost, high-throughput, automated counting of bacterial colonies.

Authors:  Matthew L Clarke; Robert L Burton; A Nayo Hill; Maritoni Litorja; Moon H Nahm; Jeeseong Hwang
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.355

3.  Automated Wormscan.

Authors:  Timothy Puckering; Jake Thompson; Sushruth Sathyamurthy; Sinduja Sukumar; Tirosh Shapira; Paul Ebert
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2017-02-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.