Literature DB >> 9161286

A comparison of treatment results in complete bilateral cleft lip and palate using a conservative approach versus Millard-Latham PSOT procedure.

S Berkowitz1.   

Abstract

Conservative non-presurgical orthopedic treatment in complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (CBCLP) cases were compared with those treated will the Millard-Latham (M-L) method, which involves the presurgical mechanical retraction of the protruding premaxilla using pinned palatal appliances. In conservatively treated cases, a head bonnet with an external elastic is sometimes used before surgical lip closure to ventroflex the premaxilla thereby reducing tension at the surgical sites. The M-L method involves premaxillary bodily retraction followed by a gingivo-periosteoplasty. In both series of cases the palatal cleft (hard and soft) is closed for patients aged 18 to 30 months using a modified von Langenbeck procedure. A secondary alveolar bone graft is only performed in the conservatively treated series for patients aged 7 to 9 years. Although the premaxilla in 2 of 29 conservatively treated cases were retruded and in anterior crossbite by 10 to 12 years of age, all M-L cases were retruded by 9 years of age requiring maxillary protraction. In the M-L cases 90% showed bony bridging of the alveolar cleft with frequent loss of the lateral incisor space; surgical closure of the nasal floor is facilitated, and early aesthetic improvement is followed by midfacial retrusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9161286     DOI: 10.1016/s1073-8746(96)80012-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Orthod        ISSN: 1073-8746            Impact factor:   0.970


  7 in total

1.  Active Presurgical Infant Orthopedics for Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate: Intercenter Outcome Comparison of Latham, Modified McNeil, and Nasoalveolar Molding.

Authors:  Michelle Kornbluth; Richard E Campbell; John Daskalogiannakis; Elizabeth J Ross; Patricia H Glick; Kathleen A Russell; Jean-Charles Doucet; Ronald R Hathaway; Ross E Long; Thomas J Sitzman
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2018-02-20

2.  Presurgical orthopaedic nasoalveolar molding in cleft lip and palate infants: a comparative evaluation of cases done with and without nasal stents.

Authors:  Rohit Punga; S M Sharma
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-09-18

Review 3.  Current knowledge in cleft lip and palate treatment from an orthodontist's point of view.

Authors:  H Friede; C Katsaros
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Naso-maxillary complex in size, position and orientation in surgically treated and untreated individuals with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Jyotsna Murthy
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2012-01

5.  Presurgical Alignment of Bilateral Cleft Segments With 3D Simulation Under Special Consideration of the Vomer: A Technical Note.

Authors:  Gül Schmidt; Max Heiland; Carsten Matuschek
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2020-10-15

6.  Modified Intraoral Repositioning Appliance in Complete Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.

Authors:  Pradeep Raghav; N K Ahuja; Subhash Gahlawat
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2010-04-15

7.  The Facial Growth Pattern and the Amount of Palatal Bone Deficiency Relative to Cleft Size Should Be Considered in Treatment Planning.

Authors:  Samuel Berkowitz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-05-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.