Literature DB >> 9161275

Three-dimensional diagnosis and management of Class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition.

J A McNamara1, J E Peterson, R G Alexander.   

Abstract

Class II malocclusion is a commonly observed problem, occurring in about one third of the United States population. The numerous treatment approaches that have been advocated to treat this malocclusion presumably produce differing treatment effects within the skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue components of the face. In the first section of this article, the three-dimensional components of Class II malocclusion are described, with transverse maxillary discrepancy, mandibular skeletal retrusion, and increased lower anterior facial height observed as common findings in a mixed dentition sample of Class II subjects. Second, the literature concerning two seemingly diverse treatment methods (extraoral traction and functional jaw orthopedics) is reviewed in detail. Last, cephalometric data are presented from a retrospective clinical study and is used to evaluate the treatment effects produced by cervical traction and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel in comparison with an untreated sample of mixed dentition Class II patients. The results of this study indicated that although both skeletal and dentoalveolar components of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion were altered in the Class I direction by either a facebow or a Fränkel appliance, these two appliance systems accomplished the correction in dramatically differing ways. Cervical traction affected the skeletal and dentoalveolar components of the maxilla and mandible, whereas the FR-2 appliance had less of an effect on maxillary and dentoalveolar components and a greater effect on mandibular length. Thus, these two treatment modalities produce decidedly different treatment effects in patients with Class II malocclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9161275     DOI: 10.1016/s1073-8746(96)80048-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Orthod        ISSN: 1073-8746            Impact factor:   0.970


  7 in total

1.  Skeletal effects in Angle Class II/1 patients treated with the functional regulator type II : Cephalometric and tensor analysis.

Authors:  Simone Schulz; Bernd Koos; Kathrin Duske; Franka Stahl
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Therapeutic approach to Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with maxillary functional orthopedics.

Authors:  Aristeu Corrêa de Bittencourt Neto; Armando Yukio Saga; Ariel Adriano Reyes Pacheco; Orlando Tanaka
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

3.  Class II treatment with fixed functional orthodontic appliances before and after the pubertal growth peak - a cephalometric study to evaluate differential therapeutic effects.

Authors:  Linda Frye; Peter R Diedrich; Gero S M Kinzinger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Class II treatment in adults: comparing camouflage orthodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthognathic surgery--a cephalometric study to evaluate various therapeutic effects.

Authors:  Gero Kinzinger; Linda Frye; Peter Diedrich
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Dentoskeletal modifications in Class II deep bite malocclusion treatment with anterior bite plane functional appliance.

Authors:  Domenico Ciavarella; Michele Laurenziello; Laura Guida; Graziano Montaruli; Crescenzio Gallo; Michele Tepedino; Lorenzo Lo Muzio
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-08-01

6.  Management of a growing Skeletal Class II Patient: A Case Report.

Authors:  Narendra Shriram Sharma
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2013-04-26

7.  Evaluation of the soft tissue treatment simulation module of a computerized cephalometric program.

Authors:  Aslihan Zeynep Oz; Cenk Ahmet Akcan; Hakan El; Semra Ciger
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.