Literature DB >> 9159487

GroEL-mediated folding of structurally homologous dihydrofolate reductases.

A C Clark1, C Frieden.   

Abstract

Using stopped-flow fluorescence techniques, we have examined both the refolding and unfolding reactions of four structurally homologous dihydrofolate reductases (murine DHFR, wild-type E. coli DHFR, and two E. coli DHFR mutants) in the presence and absence of the molecular chaperonin GroEL. We show that GroEL binds the unfolded conformation of each DHFR with second order rate constants greater than 3 x 10(7) M(-1)s(-1) at 22 degrees C. Once bound to GroEL, the proteins refold with rate constants similar to those for folding in the absence of GroEL. The overall rate of formation of native enzyme is decreased by the stability of the complex between GroEL and the last folding intermediate. For wild-type E. coli DHFR, complex formation is transient while for the others, a stable complex is formed. The stable complexes are the same regardless of whether they are formed from the unfolded or folded DHFR. When complex formation is initiated from the native conformation, GroEL binds to a pre-existing non-native conformation, presumably a late folding intermediate, rather than to the native state, thus shifting the conformational equilibrium toward the non-native species by mass action. The model presented here for the interaction of these four proteins with GroEL quantitatively describes the difference between the formation of a transient complex and a stable complex as defined by the rate constants for release and rebinding to GroEL relative to the rate constant for the last folding step. Due to this kinetic partitioning, three different mechanisms can be proposed for the formation of stable complexes between GroEL and either murine DHFR or the two E. coli DHFR mutants. These data show that productive folding of GroEL-bound proteins can occur in the absence of nucleotides or the co-chaperonin GroES and suggest that transient complex formation may be the functional role of GroEL under normal conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9159487     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  10 in total

1.  Opposite behavior of two isozymes when refolding in the presence of non-ionic detergents.

Authors:  F Doñate; A Artigues; A Iriarte; M Martinez-Carrion
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  GroEL binds a late folding intermediate of phage P22 coat protein.

Authors:  M D de Beus; S M Doyle; C M Teschke
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 3.  GroEL-mediated protein folding: making the impossible, possible.

Authors:  Zong Lin; Hays S Rye
Journal:  Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.250

4.  Identification of in vivo substrates of the yeast mitochondrial chaperonins reveals overlapping but non-identical requirement for hsp60 and hsp10.

Authors:  Y Dubaquié; R Looser; U Fünfschilling; P Jenö; S Rospert
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Protein folding: how the mechanism of GroEL action is defined by kinetics.

Authors:  C Frieden; A C Clark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-05-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Cooperative effects of potassium, magnesium, and magnesium-ADP on the release of Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase from the chaperonin GroEL.

Authors:  A C Clark; B S Karon; C Frieden
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Coupling between protein folding and allostery in the GroE chaperonin system.

Authors:  O Yifrach; A Horovitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  GroEL-assisted protein folding: does it occur within the chaperonin inner cavity?

Authors:  Victor V Marchenkov; Gennady V Semisotnov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  Probing the kinetic stabilities of Friedreich's ataxia clinical variants using a solid phase GroEL chaperonin capture platform.

Authors:  Ana R Correia; Subhashchandra Naik; Mark T Fisher; Cláudio M Gomes
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2014-10-20

Review 10.  How Important Is Protein Diffusion in Prokaryotes?

Authors:  Paul E Schavemaker; Arnold J Boersma; Bert Poolman
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2018-11-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.