Literature DB >> 9159449

Comparison of ultrasonographic findings in spontaneous abortions with normal and abnormal karyotypes.

C B Coulam1, C Goodman, A Dorfmann.   

Abstract

To determine whether ultrasonographic findings can predict the karyotype of spontaneous abortions, 137 pregnancies (54 spontaneous, 83 assisted ovulatory cycles) that subsequently aborted and had chromosome analysis performed on the products of conception were studied ultrasonographically. Transvaginal ultrasound was performed using an Acuson 128XP/10 with 7.5 MHz probe. The numbers of empty gestational sacs, small and normal for gestational size, embryonic poles and embryos with documented cardiac activity were calculated. The frequency of each of these findings in pregnancies with normal and abnormal karyotypes was compared. Of the 137 spontaneous abortions, 51 had normal chromosome analyses and 86 had abnormal karyotypes (68 aneuploidies and 18 polyploidies). Ultrasonographic findings in the 51 karyotypically normal pregnancies included 16 (31%) with empty gestational sacs, and 35 (69%) with embryonic poles, of which 24 (69%) were at least 1 week smaller than expected for gestational age and 11 (31%) were the expected size. Embryonic cardiac activity was documented in 22 (63%) of the 35 embryonic poles. Amongst 86 pregnancies with abnormal karyotypes, similar frequencies of ultrasound findings were found: 23 (27%) with empty gestational sacs, 42 (67%) with embryonic poles smaller than expected for gestational age, and 50 (79%) embryos lost after documentation of embryonic cardiac activity. No differences in the frequency of ultrasonographic findings of empty gestational sacs, small embryonic pole and embryonic cardiac activity were observed between karyotypically normal and abnormal spontaneous abortions. Ultrasonographic findings cannot predict the karyotype of spontaneous abortions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9159449     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/12.4.823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  8 in total

1.  Threatened miscarriage in general practice: diagnostic value of history taking and physical examination.

Authors:  Margreet Wieringa-de Waard; Gouke J Bonsel; Willem M Ankum; Jeroen Vos; Patrick J E Bindels
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The natural course of spontaneous miscarriage: analysis of signs and symptoms in 188 expectantly managed women.

Authors:  Margreet Wieringa-de Waard; Willem M Ankum; Gouke J Bonsel; Jeroen Vos; Petra Biewenga; Patrick J Bindels
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  First-trimester ultrasonography revealed a gestational sac featuring cystic spaces and no visible embryo: a case of trisomy 7.

Authors:  Aysel Derbent; Zerrin Yılmaz; Serap Simavlı; Ozge Ozer; Nilgün Öztürk Turhan
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2010-03-01

4.  Correlation analysis between ultrasound findings and abnormal karyotypes in the embryos from early pregnancy loss after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

Authors:  Xihong Li; Yan Ouyang; Yan Yi; Yueqiu Tan; Guangxiu Lu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  1(st) trimester miscarriage: four decades of study.

Authors:  Kathy Hardy; Philip John Hardy
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2015-04

6.  Do specific ultrasonography features identified at the time of early pregnancy loss predict fetal chromosomal abnormality? - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Huang; W Zhu; J Tang; S H Saravelos; L C Y Poon; T C Li
Journal:  Genes Dis       Date:  2018-10-13

7.  Chromosomal Aneuploidy Associated With Clinical Characteristics of Pregnancy Loss.

Authors:  Chongjuan Gu; Kuanrong Li; Ru Li; Ling Li; Xiaojun Li; Xinyu Dai; Yaojuan He
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Anti-Mullerian hormone is linked to the type of early pregnancy loss in idiopathic recurrent miscarriage: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sophie Pils; Natalia Stepien; Christine Kurz; Kazem Nouri; Regina Promberger; Johannes Ott
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.211

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.