Literature DB >> 9159447

Triple colour fluorescent in-situ hybridization for chromosomes X,Y and 1 on spare human embryos.

H Laverge1, P De Sutter, M R Verschraegen-Spae, A De Paepe, M Dhont.   

Abstract

The potential for implantation of human embryos obtained by in-vitro fertilization is presumably determined to a large extent by their chromosomal constitution but cytogenetic analysis of preimplantation embryos has been hampered by a number of practical and technical problems. With the advent of fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) a practical method for numerical chromosomal analysis has become available. A limited amount of data has been obtained with FISH on human embryos using probes binding to chromosomes X, Y, 16, 18 and 13/21 combined or for chromosomes X and Y or 1 and 17. It was our purpose to extend these data by the combined analysis of chromosomes X, Y and 1 in spare human embryos. A short fluorescent in-situ hybridization procedure involving the simultaneous use of three deoxyribonucleic acid probes detected with red, green, and a mixture of red and green was used to determine chromosomal abnormalities in 116 spare embryos with a poor morphological score and/or displaying one or more multinucleated blastomeres. The majority of the embryos was obtained by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Less than half of the embryos (n = 54) were diploid and only 39 of them were uniformly XY11 or XX11; two embryos showed a non-disjunction and 13 embryos were aneuploid. Of the remainder, 22 were mosaic, nine were either haploid, triploid or tetraploid and 12 embryos were classified as chaotic. The latter pattern was particularly frequent in multinucleated blastomeres. Our data are comparable with those obtained with FISH using other chromosomal probes and confirm that the majority of preimplantation embryos carry a numerical chromosomal defect. Aneuploidy for chromosome 1 does not appear to be more common in preimplantation embryos than is reported for other chromosomes. Although the high incidence of chromosomal anomalies is presumably biased by the fact that only embryos with a poor morphological score were analysed, it nevertheless indicates that natural selection is the foremost reason for the low implantation rates of human preimplantation embryos in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9159447     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/12.4.809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  10 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy: were we looking at the wrong chromosomes?

Authors:  M Bahçe; J Cohen; S Munné
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 2.  The cytogenetics of preimplantation human development: insights provided by traditional and novel techniques.

Authors:  Helen G Tempest; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 4.316

Review 3.  The role of aromatase inhibitors in ameliorating deleterious effects of ovarian stimulation on outcome of infertility treatment.

Authors:  Mohamed F M Mitwally; Robert F Casper; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Insights on blastomere nuclearity.

Authors:  Mónica Gil; Gustavo D'Ommar; Maria E Póo; Anna Sosa; Marta Piras; Romano Piras; Francisco Rísquez
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-12-16       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: present and future.

Authors:  Elpida Fragouli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Unequal pronuclear size--a powerful predictor of embryonic chromosome anomalies.

Authors:  D Manor; A Drugan; D Stein; M Pillar; J Itskovitz-Eldor
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for couples at high risk of Down syndrome pregnancy owing to parental translocation or mosaicism.

Authors:  C M Conn; J Cozzi; J C Harper; R M Winston; J D Delhanty
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  The association between multinucleated blastomeres and poor ovarian response under the Bologna criteria.

Authors:  Johnny S Younis; Vicky Yazdi; Ido Izhaki; Moshe Ben-Ami
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Aneuploidy involving chromosome 1 in failed-fertilized human oocytes is unrelated to maternal age.

Authors:  Jingly Fung Weier; Heinz-Ulrich G Weier; Aida Nureddin; Roger A Pedersen; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and timing of karyotype analysis in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) following assisted reproduction.

Authors:  P De Sutter; R Stadhouders; M Dutré; J Gerris; M Dhont
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.