Literature DB >> 9158517

When is bone scintigraphy necessary in the assessment of newly diagnosed, untreated prostate cancer?

S Haukaas1, J Roervik, O J Halvorsen, M Foelling.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of bone scintigraphy in the assessment of newly diagnosed, untreated prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The probability of a positive bone scan for metastases was analysed for different threshold values of pre-treatment concentrations of prostate specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage, tumour grade based on biopsy, and age in 128 men (mean age 69 years, range 50-90) with newly diagnosed, untreated prostate cancer. The overall survival probabilities estimated from PSA level, extent of bone metastases, tumour grade, clinical stage, and age were calculated using the product-limit method.
RESULTS: The positive predictive values of PSA level for bone metastases at thresholds of 10 and 20 ng/mL were poor (27.5 and 47.5%, respectively) whereas similar threshold levels of PSA gave negative predictive values of 100 and 94%, respectively, for a positive bone scan. In a univariate analysis, the overall survival was significantly affected by the extent of bone scan pathology (P < 0.001), the pre-treatment level of PSA (P < 0.001) and tumour grade (P = 0.01), whereas a multivariate analysis identified, in order of significance, tumour grade (P = 0.003), bone scan findings (P = 0.007) and PSA levels (P = 0.03) as independent prognostic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Bone scintigraphy seems to be unnecessary in the evaluation of newly diagnosed, untreated prostate cancer in patients with no clinical signs of bone pathology and serum PSA levels of < or = 10 ng/mL. However, the bone scan accurately assesses bone metastases and the prognostic significance of bone scan findings is superior to that of serum PSA level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9158517     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.00141.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  11 in total

Review 1.  The economic costs of early stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The value of serum prostate specific antigen and other parameters in detecting bone metastases in prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Ataus; A Citçi; B Alici; A U Onder; K Sönmezoğlu; A Erözenci; V Solok
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Changing the referral criteria for bone scan in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  C McArthur; G McLaughlin; R N Meddings
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Guideline for optimization of surgical and pathological quality performance for radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer management: evidentiary base.

Authors:  Joseph L Chin; John Srigley; Linda A Mayhew; R Bryan Rumble; Claire Crossley; Amber Hunter; Neil Fleshner; Bish Bora; Robin McLeod; Sheila McNair; Bernard Langer; Andrew Evans
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  A narrowing range of bone scan in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients: A retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Berat Cem Özgür; Sinan Gültekin; Musa Ekici; Demet Yılmazer; Murat Alper
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

6.  Prostate-specific antigen cutoff value for ordering sodium fluoride positron emission tomography/computed tomography bone scan in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ismet Sarikaya; Ali Sarikaya; Abdelhamid H Elgazzar; Vuslat Yurut Caloglu; Prem Sharma; Ali Baqer; Murat Caloglu; Mahmoud Alfeeli
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

7.  Predictive value of serum prostate specific antigen in detecting bone metastasis in prostate cancer patients using bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Koramadai Karuppusamy Kamaleshwaran; Bhagwant Rai Mittal; Chidambaram Natrajan Balasubramanian Harisankar; Anish Bhattacharya; Shrawan Kumar Singh; Arup K Mandal
Journal:  Indian J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-04

8.  False-negative bone scan and choline pet/ct study in a case of prostate cancer: the pitfall of the small cell prostate carcinoma variant.

Authors:  Ammad Al-Tamimi; Andrew Eik Hock Tan; Sidney Yu Wing Kwong; Christopher Cheng Wai Sam; Angela Chong; Cher Heng Tan
Journal:  World J Nucl Med       Date:  2012-05

9.  Bone scan is of doubtful value as a first staging test in the primary presentation of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lina M Carmona Echeverria; Lawrence Drudge-Coates; C Jason Wilkins; Gordon H Muir
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2012-11-05

10.  Planning primary therapy.

Authors:  P Whelan
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2000-10-10       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.