Literature DB >> 915828

Responses of single units in cat visual cortex to moving bars of light as a function of bar length.

D Rose.   

Abstract

1. The responses of single units in the cat's primary visual cortex to moving bars have been examined quantitatively as a function of bar length.2. For about half the cells studied, very long bars evoked weaker responses than short bars, implying that there were inhibitory regions flanking the receptive field centre. In another quarter of the cell sample, there was evidence of flanking regions which were facilitatory in effect.3. The strength of the flanking regions was found to vary from cell to cell and there was no sudden transition between cells which were ;hyper-complex' and those which were not.4. Within the central region of the receptive field, the responses of most (but not all) cells increased with bar length. About half the cells responded to very short bars or spots of light, but about one in six would not respond at all to short bars.5. Correlations were sought between the properties of cells as simple or complex, their responsiveness to moving spots of light, the size of their receptive field centre and the polarity, strength and size of their receptive field flanks. Simple and complex cells with small receptive fields were more likely to respond well to spots, and to have strong inhibitory flanks.6. Correlations were also sought between the above properties and several other parameters of cell behaviour. Cells with strong inhibitory flanks were found to be more broadly tuned for orientation. Individual cells were also more broadly tuned for the orientation of short bars than of long bars.7. Evidence was obtained that spatial summation can be linear or non-linear for different cells.

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 915828      PMCID: PMC1353604          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  37 in total

1.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS AND FUNCTIONAL ARCHITECTURE IN TWO NONSTRIATE VISUAL AREAS (18 AND 19) OF THE CAT.

Authors:  D H HUBEL; T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1965-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  D H HUBEL; T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Synaptic mechanisms contributing to the lenght preference of hypercomplex cells [proceedings].

Authors:  A M Sillito; V Versiani
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The unresponsive regions of visual cortical receptive fields.

Authors:  L Maffei; A Fiorentini
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Responses of complex cells in the visual cortex of the cat as a function of the length of moving slits.

Authors:  I G Bodis-Wollner; D A Pollen; S F Ronner
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1976-11-05       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Reversal of the physiological effects of monocular deprivation in kittens: further evidence for a sensitive period.

Authors:  C Blakemore; R C Van Sluyters
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Proceedings: The hypercomplex cell classification in the cat's striate cortex.

Authors:  D Rose
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-10       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Cell structure and function in the visual cortex of the cat.

Authors:  J P Kelly; D C Van Essen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Receptive fields of simple cells in the cat striate cortex.

Authors:  P O Bishop; J S Coombs; G H Henry
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Receptive field analysis: responses to moving visual contours by single lateral geniculate neurones in the cat.

Authors:  B Dreher; K J Sanderson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  32 in total

1.  Asymmetric suppression outside the classical receptive field of the visual cortex.

Authors:  G A Walker; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Spatial summation in lateral geniculate nucleus and visual cortex.

Authors:  H E Jones; I M Andolina; N M Oakely; P C Murphy; A M Sillito
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Membrane potential and conductance changes underlying length tuning of cells in cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  J S Anderson; I Lampl; D C Gillespie; D Ferster
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Oriented axon projections in primary visual cortex of the monkey.

Authors:  L C Sincich; G G Blasdel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A specific subgroup of non-length tuned relay cells in the feline dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  H E Jones; A M Sillito
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Axial responses in visual cortical cells: spatio-temporal mechanisms quantified by Fourier components of cortical tuning curves.

Authors:  F Wörgötter; U T Eysel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Stimulation of non-classical receptive field enhances orientation selectivity in the cat.

Authors:  Gang Chen; Yang Dan; Chao-Yi Li
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The length-response properties of cells in the feline dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  H E Jones; A M Sillito
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Axis of preferred motion is a function of bar length in visual cortical receptive fields.

Authors:  F Wörgötter; U T Eysel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Length and width summation in human vision at different background levels.

Authors:  A Vassilev; M Zlatkova; L Mitova
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.