Literature DB >> 9158040

Experimental evaluation of rodent exclusion methods to reduce hantavirus transmission to humans in rural housing.

G E Glass1, J S Johnson, G A Hodenbach, C L Disalvo, C J Peters, J E Childs, J N Mills.   

Abstract

An experimental assessment of methods to reduce rodent infestations in rural housing was conducted in Yosemite National Park, California, Sequoia/Kings Canyon National Parks, California, and Shenandoah National Park, Virginia. During pretreatment surveys, nearly all (63 of 68) selected units had past or ongoing rodent activity inside. Active infestations were found in 58.8% of the units. Peromyscus spp. represented 91.2% of all animals caught inside housing units. Despite little harborage, rodent activity was common near housing (290 animals/2,254 trap nights). The most common species present was Peromyscus maniculatus (43-50% of all captures). This species was especially frequent (49-87% of Peromyscus captures) around the foundations of housing units. Habitat had little effect on captures. There were 1.8 Peromyscus caught per unit along the foundations of housing in modified rural settings with grass lawns compared with 1.2 Peromyscus caught per unit in sites located in mature woodlands. During autumn of 1994, randomly selected housing units were rodent proofed by sealing openings associated with chases, roof eaves, and attics with insulation and wire mesh. Housing was examined and the fauna was resampled in the spring-summer of 1995. Rodent-proofed houses were infested significantly less often (3 of 28) than control houses (13 of 36) (P = 0.02) and the intensity of infestation was lower in experimental houses (6 versus 23 mice/treatment). More than 25% of the mice trapped inside the houses had been marked outside the houses during the three-day surveys, demonstrating movement of mice adjacent to the buildings into not rodent-proofed housing. As in the previous autumn, most of the animals captured in (98.9%) and along the foundations of the houses (77.5%) were Peromyscus spp. These results demonstrate that Peromyscus frequently invade rural housing but rodent-proofing effectively eliminates or substantially reduces rodent activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9158040     DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1997.56.359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg        ISSN: 0002-9637            Impact factor:   2.345


  16 in total

1.  An Experimental Test of Factors Attracting Deer Mice into Buildings.

Authors:  Amy J Kuenzi; Richard Douglass
Journal:  Intermt J Sci       Date:  2009-09

2.  Satellite imagery characterizes local animal reservoir populations of Sin Nombre virus in the southwestern United States.

Authors:  Gregory E Glass; Terry L Yates; Joshua B Fine; Timothy M Shields; John B Kendall; Andrew G Hope; Cheryl A Parmenter; C J Peters; Thomas G Ksiazek; Chung-Sheng Li; Jonathan A Patz; James N Mills
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Household characteristics associated with rodent presence and Leptospira infection in rural and urban communities from Southern Chile.

Authors:  Claudia Muñoz-Zanzi; Meghan Mason; Carolina Encina; Marcelo Gonzalez; Sergey Berg
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  Rodent community structure and Andes virus infection in sylvan and peridomestic habitats in northwestern Patagonia, Argentina.

Authors:  Luciana Piudo; Martin J Monteverde; R Susan Walker; Richard J Douglass
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 2.133

5.  Seasonal dispersal patterns of sylvan deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) within Montana rangelands.

Authors:  Dean Waltee; Brent N Lonner; Amy J Kuenzi; Richard J Douglass
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.535

6.  Navigational instinct: a reason not to live trap deer mice in residences.

Authors:  C H Calisher; W P Sweeney; J J Root; B J Beaty
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  A Comparative Assessment of Track Plates to Quantify Fine Scale Variations in the Relative Abundance of Norway Rats in Urban Slums.

Authors:  Kathryn P Hacker; Amanda Minter; Mike Begon; Peter J Diggle; Soledad Serrano; Mitermayer G Reis; James E Childs; Albert I Ko; Federico Costa
Journal:  Urban Ecosyst       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.005

8.  Hantavirus reservoir hosts associated with peridomestic habitats in Argentina.

Authors:  G Calderón; N Pini; J Bolpe; S Levis; J Mills; E Segura; N Guthmann; G Cantoni; J Becker; A Fonollat; C Ripoll; M Bortman; R Benedetti; D Enria
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Human hantavirus infections, Sweden.

Authors:  Gert E Olsson; Fredrik Dalerum; Birger Hörnfeldt; Fredrik Elgh; Thomas R Palo; Per Juto; Clas Ahlm
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Removing deer mice from buildings and the risk for human exposure to Sin Nombre virus.

Authors:  Richard J Douglass; Amy J Kuenzi; Courtney Y Williams; Samuel J Douglass; James N Mills
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.883

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.