Literature DB >> 9156419

Risks and benefits of pediatric bone marrow donation: a critical need for research.

V Weisz1, J K Robbennolt.   

Abstract

Healthcare providers assume that there are minimal risks and potential psychosocial benefits for children who undergo a bone marrow harvest for the benefit of their critically ill siblings. Ethical justifications for the use of children as donors rely on there being minimal risks since donors receive no direct medical benefits from the intervention. There is little empirical research regarding psychosocial consequences. This article review relevant research in three contexts: a) psychosocial outcomes for adults and children who donate tissue and organs; b) psychosocial impacts on a sibling of a pediatric cancer patient; and c) children's decision-making regarding medical decisions. The relevant research literature supports the belief that the psychosocial impact on a child bone marrow donor will be influenced by the survival of the recipient, the age of the donor, and the donor's participation in the decision to donate. In order to empirically validate the actual psychosocial risks (and benefits) for donors, it is argued that direct research is needed so that a donor's well-being can be protected.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9156419     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(199623)14:4<375::AID-BSL247>3.0.CO;2-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Sci Law        ISSN: 0735-3936


  7 in total

1.  The need to promote all pediatric stem cell donors' understanding and interests.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross; Armand H Matheny Antommaria
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Parent versus child donor perceptions of the bone marrow donation experience.

Authors:  G E Switzer; J Bruce; G Pastorek; D M Kiefer; H Kobusingye; R Drexler; R A M Besser; D L Confer; M M Horowitz; R J King; B E Shaw; S M van Walraven; L Wiener; W Packman; J W Varni; M A Pulsipher
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Family Strategies to Support Siblings of Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients.

Authors:  Taylor E White; Kristopher A Hendershot; Margie D Dixon; Wendy Pelletier; Ann Haight; Kristin Stegenga; Melissa A Alderfer; Lydia Cox; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Pamela Hinds; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Health-Related Quality of Life among Pediatric Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donors.

Authors:  Galen E Switzer; Jessica Bruce; Deidre M Kiefer; Hati Kobusingye; Rebecca Drexler; RaeAnne M Besser; Dennis L Confer; Mary M Horowitz; Roberta J King; Bronwen E Shaw; Suzanna M van Walraven; Lori Wiener; Wendy Packman; James W Varni; Michael A Pulsipher
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 5.  Hematopoietic stem cell donation in children: a review of the sibling donor experience.

Authors:  Lori S Wiener; Emilie Steffen-Smith; Terry Fry; Alan S Wayne
Journal:  J Psychosoc Oncol       Date:  2007

6.  Children as hematopoietic stem cell donors.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 7.  Donor Selection for Allogenic Hemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Clinical and Ethical Considerations.

Authors:  Irene Riezzo; Natascha Pascale; Raffaele La Russa; Arcangelo Liso; Monica Salerno; Emanuela Turillazzi
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.443

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.