Literature DB >> 9156199

Contrast dependencies of two types of motion aftereffect.

S Nishida1, H Ashida, T Sato.   

Abstract

We examined the effects of adaptation and test contrasts on the duration of two types of motion aftereffect (MAE) that presumably reveal different levels of motion processing: MAE with a static test stimulus (static MAE), and that with a counterphasing test stimulus (flicker MAE). MAE duration increased with increasing adaptation contrast. When the test contrast was low, it increased rapidly, and saturated at a low adaptation contrast. When the test contrast was high, however, it gradually increased over a wide range of adaptation contrasts. These complex effects of stimulus contrasts could be well described by a dependency on adaptation contrast normalized by test contrast on a logarithmic axis. Little difference was found between the results for two types of MAE. The interaction between adaptation and test contrasts leads us to reject the idea that the shape of adaptation contrast dependency of MAE duration reflects that of the sensitivity function of motion detecting mechanisms. The results also suggest a functional similarity between the processes underlying static and flicker MAEs with regard to their responses to contrasts.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9156199     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00181-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  6 in total

1.  Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Duje Tadin; Kenith V Sobel; Tony A Raissian; Sang Chul Chong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Visual discomfort from flicker: Effects of mean light level and contrast.

Authors:  Sanae Yoshimoto; Fang Jiang; Tatsuto Takeuchi; Arnold J Wilkins; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  A review of visual aftereffects in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Katharine N Thakkar; Steven M Silverstein; Jan W Brascamp
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  Suppressive mechanisms in visual motion processing: From perception to intelligence.

Authors:  Duje Tadin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 5.  Seeing the invisible: the scope and limits of unconscious processing in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Zhicheng Lin; Sheng He
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 11.685

6.  Fast development of global motion processing in human infants.

Authors:  Emily J Blumenthal; Rain G Bosworth; Karen R Dobkins
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.