Literature DB >> 9155609

Poor clinical performance of the Wessex porcine heart valve bioprosthesis at nine years' follow up.

A Hurlé1, J F Nistal, J M Revuelta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the long term performance of the Wessex porcine bioprostheses implanted in a consecutive series of patients.
DESIGN: A retrospective case series. PATIENTS: Between January 1985 and July 1991, 184 Wessex bioprostheses (78 mitral, 102 aortic, and 4 tricuspid) were implanted in 150 patients. The patients were 55% (83/150) male and 45% (67/150) female; mean age was 60 (SD 10) years.
RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 9.3% (14/150). Total follow up was 696 patient-years (mean 4.7 years per patient). Linearised rates (events per 100 patient-years (SEM) for postoperative complications for patients with isolated mitral valve replacement, isolated aortic valve replacement, and multiple valve replacement were, respectively: late mortality: 4.7 (1.6), 3.3 (0.9), and 4.9 (1.9); thromboembolism: 5.8 (1.8), 3.0 (0.9), and 2.8 (1.4); valve thrombosis: 1.0 (0.7), 0.3 (0.3), and 0.7 (0.7); structural failure: 5.8 (1.7), 1.9 (0.7), and 7.1 (2.2). Actuarial freedom from complications at nine years (70% confidence interval) was: late mortality: 61 (9)%, 57 (13)%, and 59 (12)%; thromboembolism and valve thrombosis: 71 (9)%, 79 (6)%, and 81 (8)%; structural failure: 33 (14)%, 50 (16)%, and 12 (14)%; all valve related morbidity/mortality: 31 (10)%, 21 (11)%, and 7 (9)%. Stent fractures appeared in 11 of 17 explanted prostheses; actuarial freedom from stent fracture at nine years was 66 (12)%.
CONCLUSIONS: The Wessex bioprosthesis is associated with high thrombogenicity, early structural dysfunction, and a high valve related morbidity/mortality which justifies very close follow up of patients fitted with them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9155609      PMCID: PMC484724          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.77.4.319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  13 in total

Review 1.  Prosthetic heart valve performance: long-term follow-up.

Authors:  G L Grunkemeier; A Starr; S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.200

2.  Ten-year follow-up study of patients who had double valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis.

Authors:  K V Arom; D M Nicoloff; T E Kersten; W F Northrup; W G Lindsay; R W Emery
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  [A mid-term clinical and hemodynamic evaluation of the Wessex and Hancock II bioprostheses].

Authors:  A Santalla; I Rodríguez-Bailón; M Calleja; L Tercedor; S Cervera; J Lara; T Moreno
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  1992 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 4.753

4.  Incidence of primary tissue valve failure in porcine bioprosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  I Gallo; F Nistal; R Blasquez; E Arbe; E Artiñano
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Ten-year experience with the porcine bioprosthetic valve: interrelationship of valve survival and patient survival in 1,050 valve replacements.

Authors:  E L Jones; W S Weintraub; J M Craver; R A Guyton; C L Cohen; V E Corrigan; C R Hatcher
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Mitral prosthetic valve regurgitation due to stent fracture of a porcine bioprosthesis.

Authors:  J Au; C Campanella
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Porcine versus pericardial bioprostheses: a comparison of late results in 1,593 patients.

Authors:  L C Pelletier; M Carrier; Y Leclerc; G Lepage; P deGuise; I Dyrda
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Electrophysiologic spectrum of concealed intranodal conduction during atrial rate acceleration in a model of 2:1 atrioventricular block.

Authors:  J McKinnie; B Avitall; J Caceres; M Jazayeri; P Tchou; M Akhtar
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Valve-related complications with the Hancock I porcine bioprosthesis. A twelve- to fourteen-year follow-up study.

Authors:  J M Bernal; J M Rabasa; J C Cagigas; J R Echevarria; M F Carrion; J M Revuelta
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Ten years' experience with the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis.

Authors:  K V Arom; D M Nicoloff; T E Kersten; W F Northrup; W G Lindsay; R W Emery
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  1 in total

1.  The United Kingdom Heart Valve Registry: the first 10 years.

Authors:  K Taylor
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.994

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.