Literature DB >> 9155496

Meal frequency and plasma lipids and lipoproteins.

J Mann1.   

Abstract

Epidemiological data suggesting benefits of increased meal frequency on CHD risk and lipid and lipoprotein levels may be flawed because of biases associated with the method of data collection. In normolipidaemic individuals increasing meal frequency from three to six or more meals daily over a period of several weeks appears to be associated with reduced levels of total and LDL-cholesterol, possibly due to reduced cholesterol synthesis or enhancement of reverse cholesterol transport. However, in non-obese individuals with polygenic hyperlipidaemia and non-insulin-dependent diabetes, altered meal frequency does not appear to confer similar benefits. The reasons for the different responses in these groups of subjects is not clear. The reported effects of altered meal frequency on diurnal levels of triacylglycerols and fatty acids are more variable, with benefits being reported principally in association with meal frequencies exceeding those which might be translated into practical recommendations. Present data preclude recommendations concerning meal frequency on the basis of effects on lipids and lipoproteins. Even in healthy individuals amongst whom benefits have been observed, the periods of observation have been relatively short and it is not known whether adaptation occurs. Further research should focus on longer-term studies in healthy individuals as well as hyperinsulinaemic and diabetic subjects. For those individuals choosing to have a large number of small meals each day, it is relevant to emphasize that no untoward effects of increased meal frequency on lipids or lipoproteins have been demonstrated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9155496     DOI: 10.1079/bjn19970106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  6 in total

1.  Does hunger and satiety drive eating anymore? Increasing eating occasions and decreasing time between eating occasions in the United States.

Authors:  Barry M Popkin; Kiyah J Duffey
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Relationship between frequency of eating and cardiovascular disease mortality in U.S. adults: the NHANES III follow-up study.

Authors:  Hsin-Jen Chen; Youfa Wang; Lawrence J Cheskin
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Increased physical activity combined with more eating occasions is beneficial against dyslipidemias in children. The Healthy Growth Study.

Authors:  George Moschonis; Christina Mavrogianni; Kalliopi Karatzi; Vasiliki Iatridi; George P Chrousos; Christos Lionis; Yannis Manios
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 5.614

4.  International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: meal frequency.

Authors:  Paul M La Bounty; Bill I Campbell; Jacob Wilson; Elfego Galvan; John Berardi; Susan M Kleiner; Richard B Kreider; Jeffrey R Stout; Tim Ziegenfuss; Marie Spano; Abbie Smith; Jose Antonio
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 5.150

5.  Five meal patterns are differently associated with nutrient intakes, lifestyle factors and energy misreporting in a sub-sample of the Malmö Diet and Cancer cohort.

Authors:  Isabel Holmbäck; Ulrika Ericson; Bo Gullberg; Elisabet Wirfält
Journal:  Food Nutr Res       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.894

6.  Eating two larger meals a day (breakfast and lunch) is more effective than six smaller meals in a reduced-energy regimen for patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised crossover study.

Authors:  Hana Kahleova; Lenka Belinova; Hana Malinska; Olena Oliyarnyk; Jaroslava Trnovska; Vojtech Skop; Ludmila Kazdova; Monika Dezortova; Milan Hajek; Andrea Tura; Martin Hill; Terezie Pelikanova
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 10.122

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.