PURPOSE: The aim of this histochemical study was to demonstrate the absorption of dextran 500 and its distribution in the cornea after storage under standard eye bank conditions. Furthermore, an attempt was made to distinguish between the soluble and insoluble parts of dextran 500 absorbed by the cornea, in order to see how much dextran remains in the cornea after transplantation. METHODS: Forty-nine fresh and 65 organ-cultured human corneas were investigated. The corneas were cultured for 28 days in a dextran-free medium, followed by a period of 1-14 days in a medium containing 5% dextran 500. Cryosections were stained by aqueous PAS and a modified alcoholic PAS to determine the amount of dextran. RESULTS: Dextran was not found in the epithelium, stroma or endothelium of fresh human corneas. By contrast, extra- and intracellular positive staining reactions were detected in corneas following storage in a medium containing dextran. Dextran 500 absorption was relatively diffuse in the epithelium after storage in a dextran medium. Initial accumulations were found in the stroma near Bowman's and Descemet's membranes and also in the central part of the cornea, as the period of culture in the medium containing dextran lengthened. We also observed interaction between the stroma and endothelium: decreasing amounts in the endothelium were followed by an increase of same in the stroma. Intracellular deposits of dextran were detected after only one day. A much greater part of the extracellular dextran than previously described was found to be insoluble. CONCLUSIONS: As the amount of dextran in the cornea increases over a longer storage time, we conclude that the period of storage in a medium containing dextran should be limited to four days. The fact that the cornea is saturated with dextran after seven days has been shown in further studies to interfere with mitochondrial function and may also cause severe post-operative swelling of the transplant, hence leading to a longer recovery period for the patient.
PURPOSE: The aim of this histochemical study was to demonstrate the absorption of dextran 500 and its distribution in the cornea after storage under standard eye bank conditions. Furthermore, an attempt was made to distinguish between the soluble and insoluble parts of dextran 500 absorbed by the cornea, in order to see how much dextran remains in the cornea after transplantation. METHODS: Forty-nine fresh and 65 organ-cultured human corneas were investigated. The corneas were cultured for 28 days in a dextran-free medium, followed by a period of 1-14 days in a medium containing 5% dextran 500. Cryosections were stained by aqueous PAS and a modified alcoholic PAS to determine the amount of dextran. RESULTS:Dextran was not found in the epithelium, stroma or endothelium of fresh human corneas. By contrast, extra- and intracellular positive staining reactions were detected in corneas following storage in a medium containing dextran. Dextran 500 absorption was relatively diffuse in the epithelium after storage in a dextran medium. Initial accumulations were found in the stroma near Bowman's and Descemet's membranes and also in the central part of the cornea, as the period of culture in the medium containing dextran lengthened. We also observed interaction between the stroma and endothelium: decreasing amounts in the endothelium were followed by an increase of same in the stroma. Intracellular deposits of dextran were detected after only one day. A much greater part of the extracellular dextran than previously described was found to be insoluble. CONCLUSIONS: As the amount of dextran in the cornea increases over a longer storage time, we conclude that the period of storage in a medium containing dextran should be limited to four days. The fact that the cornea is saturated with dextran after seven days has been shown in further studies to interfere with mitochondrial function and may also cause severe post-operative swelling of the transplant, hence leading to a longer recovery period for the patient.
Authors: Christian Meltendorf; Christian Ohrloff; Peter Rieck; Jan Schroeter Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2006-04-25 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Annekatrin Rickmann; Karl Boden; Silke Wahl; Andre Trouvain; Andre Schulz; Peter Szurman Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2021-10-21 Impact factor: 2.031
Authors: Samuel Lawman; Peter W Madden; Vito Romano; Yue Dong; Sharon Mason; Bryan M Williams; Stephen B Kaye; Colin E Willoughby; Simon P Harding; Yao-Chun Shen; Yalin Zheng Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Xiaokun Wang; Yong Huang; Sabah Jastaneiah; Shoumyo Majumdar; Jin U Kang; Samuel C Yiu; Walter Stark; Jennifer H Elisseeff Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 3.240